cs2: Adding a Planetary Boundary Section

[robertsalzwedel]

Purpose of this PR

The purpose of this PR is to compare scenarios based on their implications on planetary boundary indicators.
This is only applicable to coupled REMIND-MAgPIE runs, as currently most indicators are land-based.

DRAFT PART:
As this is only applicable to coupled runs, the changes are introduced in the magpie.Rmd file as the coupled profile REMIND-MAgPIE does not support multiple userSectionPath. This works for now.

I also added an individual planetaryboundaries.Rmd profile, to only look at PB indicators. This still has to be changed to not have the functionality twice: Either find a way to call planetaryboundaries.Rmd and magpie.Rmd consecutively in REMIND-MAgPIE profile or remove planetary boundary profile.

Type of change

Indicate the items relevant for your PR by replacing ◻️ with ☑️.
Do not delete any lines. This makes it easier to understand which areas are affected by your changes and which are not.

Parts concerned

• ◻️ GAMS Code
• ◻️ R-scripts
• ◻️ Documentation (GAMS incode documentation, comments, tutorials)
• ◻️ Input data / CES parameters
• ◻️ Tests, CI/CD (continuous integration/deployment)
• ◻️ Configuration (switches in main.gms, default.cfg, and scenario_config*.csv files)
• ◻️ Other (please give a description)

Impact

• ◻️ Bug fix
• ◻️ Refactoring
• ◻️ New feature
• ◻️ Change of parameter values or input data (including CES parameters)
• ◻️ Minor change (default scenarios show only small differences)
• ◻️ Fundamental change of results of default scenarios

Checklist

Do not delete any line. Leave unfinished elements unchecked so others know how far along you are.
In the end all checkboxes must be ticked before you can merge.

• I executed the automated model tests (make test) after my final commit and all tests pass (FAIL 0)
• I adjusted the reporting in remind2 if and where it was needed
• I adjusted the madrat packages (mrremind and other packages involved) for input data generation if and where it was needed
• My code follows the coding etiquette
• I explained my changes within the PR, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I checked that the in-code documentation is up-to-date
• I adjusted forbiddenColumnNames in readCheckScenarioConfig.R in case the PR leads to deprecated switches
• I updated the CHANGELOG.md correctly (added, changed, fixed, removed, input data/calibration)

Further information (optional)

• Runs with these changes are here:
• Comparison of results (what changes by this PR?):