Skip to content

Automated Resyntax fixes#761

Merged
rfindler merged 9 commits intomasterfrom
autofix-104-1
Jul 30, 2025
Merged

Automated Resyntax fixes#761
rfindler merged 9 commits intomasterfrom
autofix-104-1

Conversation

@resyntax-ci
Copy link
Contributor

@resyntax-ci resyntax-ci bot commented Jul 27, 2025

Resyntax fixed 20 issues in 5 files.

  • Fixed 11 occurrences of let-to-define
  • Fixed 2 occurrences of for-each-to-for
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of send-chain-to-send+
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of nested-if-to-cond
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of map-to-for
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of define-lambda-to-define
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of hash-ref-with-constant-lambda-to-hash-ref-without-lambda
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of if-else-false-to-and
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of if-begin-to-cond

resyntax-ci bot added 9 commits July 27, 2025 00:14
…t-lambda`

The lambda can be removed from the failure result in this `hash-ref` expression.
Internal definitions are recommended instead of `let` expressions, to reduce nesting.
The `define` form supports a shorthand for defining functions.
This `if` expression can be refactored to an equivalent expression using `and`.
This `for-each` operation can be replaced with a `for` loop.
This `map` operation can be replaced with a `for/list` loop.
Using `cond` instead of `if` here makes `begin` unnecessary
This method chain made of nested `send` expressions can be written more clearly as a `send+` expression.
This `if`-`else` chain can be converted to a `cond` expression.
@rfindler rfindler merged commit c5b033f into master Jul 30, 2025
2 of 3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant