Skip to content

Automated Resyntax fixes#760

Closed
resyntax-ci[bot] wants to merge 9 commits intomasterfrom
autofix-103-1
Closed

Automated Resyntax fixes#760
resyntax-ci[bot] wants to merge 9 commits intomasterfrom
autofix-103-1

Conversation

@resyntax-ci
Copy link
Contributor

@resyntax-ci resyntax-ci bot commented Jul 20, 2025

Resyntax fixed 20 issues in 4 files.

  • Fixed 11 occurrences of let-to-define
  • Fixed 2 occurrences of define-lambda-to-define
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of if-let-to-cond
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of send-chain-to-send+
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of nested-if-to-cond
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of hash-ref-with-constant-lambda-to-hash-ref-without-lambda
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of if-else-false-to-and
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of for-each-to-for
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of if-begin-to-cond

resyntax-ci bot added 9 commits July 20, 2025 00:12
Using `cond` instead of `if` here makes `begin` unnecessary
`cond` with internal definitions is preferred over `if` with `let`, to reduce nesting
…t-lambda`

The lambda can be removed from the failure result in this `hash-ref` expression.
Internal definitions are recommended instead of `let` expressions, to reduce nesting.
The `define` form supports a shorthand for defining functions.
This `if` expression can be refactored to an equivalent expression using `and`.
This `for-each` operation can be replaced with a `for` loop.
This method chain made of nested `send` expressions can be written more clearly as a `send+` expression.
This `if`-`else` chain can be converted to a `cond` expression.
@rfindler
Copy link
Member

old one

@rfindler rfindler closed this Aug 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant