move to semaphore#165
Open
jiayisuse wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Summary: sched_yield looping results in much higher latency in highly concurrent pipe I/O. It's not strictly busy wait, but relinquish CPU and move to the end of priority task queue while no immediately available data. http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/sched_yield.2.html. The overhead of re-scheduling and context switch could be high. Conversely, modern semaphore/mutex is kind hybrid locking of spinlock and sleep-lock - performs spinklock for the first part of remained scheduled CPU time and sleep after if lock is unavailable. It avoids both frequent re-scheduling and eating up CPU with spin. In practice it's always performs better than pure spinlock or re-schedule, even to protect lightweight operations like counter update. Differential Revision: D21446104 fbshipit-source-id: b49bb1bc6b5576142344ed83d964ff6df5b21477
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D21446104 |
Contributor
|
I want to take a close look at this, as it goes against what I had observed, so it may take a bit to get back to you, sorry... |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary: sched_yield looping results in much higher latency in highly concurrent pipe I/O. It's not strictly busy wait, but relinquish CPU and move to the end of priority task queue while no immediately available data. http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/sched_yield.2.html. The overhead of re-scheduling and context switch could be high. Conversely, modern semaphore/mutex is kind hybrid locking of spinlock and sleep-lock - performs spinklock for the first part of remained scheduled CPU time and sleep after if lock is unavailable. It avoids both frequent re-scheduling and eating up CPU with spin. In practice it's always performs better than pure spinlock or re-schedule, even to protect lightweight operations like counter update.
Differential Revision: D21446104