Skip to content

Conversation

@f-f
Copy link
Member

@f-f f-f commented Dec 9, 2025

WIP, should fix #696, fix #649

@f-f
Copy link
Member Author

f-f commented Dec 9, 2025

Main chunks of work to be done at this point:

  • enqueuing/running matrix jobs, need to settle on a design for this. Current direction is "build plan is fixed at submission time, and we dynamically add jobs for dependent packages after a job is completed"
  • enqueing/running package set jobs, need to figure out auth story for that
  • return jobs from the API; need to spec it more:
    • do we keep backwards compatibility? Spago should keep working
    • what details do we return?
    • when returning a list we should allowing selecting queued/done/in progress jobs

@f-f f-f mentioned this pull request Dec 9, 2025
@fsoikin
Copy link
Contributor

fsoikin commented Dec 9, 2025

But the first two bullets can be implemented as separate changes, right? They're not needed for strict parity.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants