Skip to content

Conversation

@jkroonza
Copy link
Contributor

Closes: #574

@jkroonza
Copy link
Contributor Author

NOTE: This has only been compile tested, @betulum - could you please confirm if this solves your issue from #574?

@Neustradamus
Copy link
Member

@paulusmack: A new PR has been done by @jkroonza, can you look?

@paulusmack
Copy link
Collaborator

I would like to hear an explanation of a use case where it is not sufficient for the user to append "2>/some/file" to the connect script.

@jkroonza
Copy link
Contributor Author

jkroonza commented Dec 6, 2025

@paulusmack if it's that simple, and @betulum either confirms, or doesn't respond in a sensible time, then I suggest we discard this.

@betulum
Copy link

betulum commented Jan 7, 2026

I would like to hear an explanation of a use case where it is not sufficient for the user to append "2>/some/file" to the connect script.

I agree, that approach works fine. Thank you for your hint and sorry for being late with the answer.
@jkroonza, I confirm, you can discard this PR

@Neustradamus
Copy link
Member

@betulum: It can be closed?
So, it does not solve #574?

@betulum
Copy link

betulum commented Jan 8, 2026

@betulum: It can be closed? So, it does not solve #574?

Yes, I prefer it closing. Redirecting stderr, like proposed by @paulusmack , serves the same purpose

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

stderr redirects to connect-errors

4 participants