-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60
maintainer,dispatcher: fence stale maintainer epochs #5435
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
hongyunyan
wants to merge
9
commits into
pingcap:master
Choose a base branch
from
hongyunyan:codex/pr-5182-stale-maintainer-fence
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+1,344
−338
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
57df930
coordinator: persist maintainer epochs before ownership changes
hongyunyan 38669c8
maintainer,dispatcher: fence stale maintainer epochs
hongyunyan 0d8b952
coordinator: address resume review feedback
hongyunyan a4f7d30
Merge branch 'codex/pr-5182-epoch-persistence' into codex/pr-5182-sta…
hongyunyan 06a6788
coordinator: refresh changefeed backend mock
hongyunyan 7366373
Merge branch 'codex/pr-5182-epoch-persistence' into codex/pr-5182-sta…
hongyunyan cd9e0b5
pkg: use canonical errors import
hongyunyan f10352d
Merge branch 'codex/pr-5182-epoch-persistence' into codex/pr-5182-sta…
hongyunyan 45f36e3
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into codex/pr-5182-sta…
hongyunyan File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
IsMaintainerRequestAllowedmethod currently acquires a write lock (e.meta.Lock()) even though it only performs read operations. Sincee.metaembedssync.RWMutex, it is highly recommended to useRLock()andRUnlock()here to allow concurrent read access and avoid unnecessary serialization of heartbeat and scheduler checks.Additionally,
GetMaintainerID()andGetMaintainerEpoch()(which are called concurrently in other parts of the codebase, such as logging insidepreCheckForSchedulerHandler) currently accesse.metafields without any locking. This introduces a data race withTryUpdateMaintainerwhich writes to these fields. They should also be updated to useRLock()andRUnlock()to ensure thread safety.