chore: fix linter #16
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@pilat has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 2 minutes and 22 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
WalkthroughThis pull request adds a GolangCI-Lint configuration file, removes related entries from .gitignore, removes build targets from the Makefile, refactors CLI command code for style consistency, improves type safety in certificate handling, and modifies the Project struct including removal of the hostConfigs field. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~22 minutes Areas requiring attention:
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
cmd/devbox/restart.go (1)
59-66: Consider logging or panicking on completion registration failure.While suppressing the error satisfies the linter, if
RegisterFlagCompletionFuncfails (e.g., invalid flag name), it will be silently ignored. Since this is ininit()and failures indicate programmer error, consider panicking to catch configuration issues early during development.🔎 Optional improvement to catch registration errors
- _ = cmd.RegisterFlagCompletionFunc("profile", func(cmd *cobra.Command, args []string, toComplete string) ([]string, cobra.ShellCompDirective) { + if err := cmd.RegisterFlagCompletionFunc("profile", func(cmd *cobra.Command, args []string, toComplete string) ([]string, cobra.ShellCompDirective) { p, err := manager.AutodetectProject(projectName) if err != nil { return []string{}, cobra.ShellCompDirectiveNoFileComp } return getProfileCompletions(p, toComplete) - }) + }); err != nil { + panic(fmt.Sprintf("failed to register profile completion: %v", err)) + }cmd/devbox/up.go (1)
80-87: Consider logging or panicking on completion registration failure.Similar to restart.go, suppressing the error from
RegisterFlagCompletionFunchides potential registration failures. Since this is ininit()and failures indicate programmer error, consider panicking to catch configuration issues early during development.🔎 Optional improvement to catch registration errors
- _ = cmd.RegisterFlagCompletionFunc("profile", func(cmd *cobra.Command, args []string, toComplete string) ([]string, cobra.ShellCompDirective) { + if err := cmd.RegisterFlagCompletionFunc("profile", func(cmd *cobra.Command, args []string, toComplete string) ([]string, cobra.ShellCompDirective) { p, err := manager.AutodetectProject(projectName) if err != nil { return []string{}, cobra.ShellCompDirectiveNoFileComp } return getProfileCompletions(p, toComplete) - }) + }); err != nil { + panic(fmt.Sprintf("failed to register profile completion: %v", err)) + }.golangci.yml (1)
1-28: LGTM! Solid linter configuration.The configuration is well-structured with appropriate linters enabled. The commented-out linters (
wrapcheck,gocyclo) with TODO markers indicate a sensible incremental adoption strategy.The following linters could be enabled in a future PR once the codebase is ready:
wrapcheck(line 6) - helps ensure errors are properly wrapped with contextgocyclo(line 11) - helps identify overly complex functions (min-complexity already set to 15)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
.gitignore(0 hunks).golangci.yml(1 hunks)Makefile(0 hunks)cmd/devbox/restart.go(2 hunks)cmd/devbox/run.go(1 hunks)cmd/devbox/up.go(1 hunks)internal/cert/cert.go(2 hunks)internal/project/project.go(6 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- .gitignore
- Makefile
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
internal/project/project.go (2)
internal/project/config.go (4)
SourceConfigs(3-3)ScenarioConfigs(11-11)HostConfigs(23-23)CertConfig(29-33)internal/project/export.go (1)
Duration(9-9)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
cmd/devbox/run.go (1)
86-93: LGTM: Switch statement improves readability.The refactor from if-else chain to a switch statement is a stylistic improvement that makes the TTY allocation logic clearer and more idiomatic. The behavior remains functionally equivalent.
cmd/devbox/restart.go (1)
96-98: LGTM: More idiomatic boolean expression.The simplified condition
!noDeps && !isRunningis more idiomatic thannoDeps == false && !isRunningwhile maintaining identical behavior.internal/cert/cert.go (2)
240-245: Excellent type safety improvement!The explicit type assertion with error checking prevents potential panics and makes the code more robust. This is a critical improvement over a direct type assertion.
270-270: Nice refactor to idiomatic Go!Using
append(certTemplate.DNSNames, extra...)is more concise and idiomatic than an explicit loop.internal/project/project.go (4)
198-198: Appropriate use of nolint directives.The
//nolint:forcetypeassertdirectives are justified here. These type assertions are safe because the types are registered upfront viacli.WithExtension()in theNew()function (lines 67-71), which guarantees the correct types will be returned from the Extensions map.Also applies to: 206-206, 214-214, 248-248, 265-265
307-307: Good simplification!Removing the unnecessary
filepath.Join()call is correct sincefilepath.Joinwith a single argument simply returns that argument unchanged.
355-358: Logic correctly prevents consecutive underscores.The implementation properly avoids consecutive underscores by checking
!prevWasUnderscorebefore adding an underscore replacement. The logic is sound.
23-35: The removal of thehostConfigsfield from theProjectstruct is safe and does not break any references in the codebase. No code attempts to accessp.hostConfigsorproject.hostConfigs. The functionality is properly replaced by theHostEntitiesfield.
Fix linter
Summary by CodeRabbit
Chores
Refactor
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.