🧪 Add test for quadratic_weighted_roll distribution#7
Conversation
Co-authored-by: perim <436583+perim@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
🎯 What: The
quadratic_weighted_rollfunction lacked a unit test verifying its underlying distribution.📊 Coverage: A test case
test_quadratic_weighted_roll_distributionhas been introduced mimickingtest_pow2_weighted_roll_distribution. It testshigh = 4using 1,000,000 rolls to statistically verify the expected quadratic distribution.✨ Result: Test coverage for
quadratic_weighted_rollprobabilities and boundary outcomes ensures robust determinism. Flakiness is negated using a generous standard deviation bound.PR created automatically by Jules for task 12287809464926516590 started by @perim