🧪 [Testing Improvement] Exhaustive snap direction tests#1
Conversation
Co-authored-by: perim <436583+perim@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
@jules please resolve the merge conflict. |
I have successfully resolved the merge conflict in |
Co-authored-by: perim <436583+perim@users.noreply.github.com>
🎯 What: Added exhaustive testing for the
snapfunction indirection.h.📊 Coverage: The test now checks all possible 16-bit values (
0toUINT16_MAX) to ensure they correctly snap to the nearest cardinal point (0, 16384, 32768, 49152). This implicitly covers positive and negative values (due to wrap-around behavior), values close to cardinal points, and values exactly at cardinal points.✨ Result: Increased test coverage and confidence in the determinism and correctness of the
snapfunction. All 65536 possible states are verified locally.PR created automatically by Jules for task 15781837379914690619 started by @perim