[codex] Surface local knowledge unavailable diagnostics#1999
Closed
HendrikD2005 wants to merge 2 commits into
Closed
[codex] Surface local knowledge unavailable diagnostics#1999HendrikD2005 wants to merge 2 commits into
HendrikD2005 wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
Signed-off-by: HendrikD2005 <144935017+HendrikD2005@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: HendrikD2005 <144935017+HendrikD2005@users.noreply.github.com>
6609b97 to
72a29a7
Compare
Contributor
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Surface actionable Local Knowledge diagnostics when the connector cannot load after runtime/storage disruption.
Refs #1996
Scope
Reuse And No-Duplication
Delivery Board
Keiko Product Deliveryproject.Parent Epic: #<epic_number>unless this PR updates an epic container directly.Classification: Epic,Status: Open Epics, and priority/order set for top-to-bottom implementation sequencing.Classification: Task,Status: In Progresswhile active, inherited or explicitPriority, andHuman Review Required: Yes.StatusisIn Progresswhile work is active, orDoneonly after merge and closure evidence.Workflow StateisPR OpenorReady for Human Review.Owner / Agent,Branch,Pull Request, andHuman Review Requiredare filled.status: in progress,status: ready for human review, orstatus: doneafter merge.dev, enable auto-merge, close the issue, or bypass human review unless explicitly authorized by the human maintainer.Product Impact
Update Impact
fixes.normal.Verification
Required:
Local verification:
Reuse / gap rationale:
Select only what applies:
npm run check:release-impactor an explicit rationale.Not applicable rationale:
Review And Closure
Resolves #<issue_number>only when this PR should close the issue.Risk Notes
Low implementation risk: this is a UI-only formatting change that keeps server redaction intact and displays only stable diagnostic codes plus correlation ids already designed for support. The main operational risk is that the broader UI coverage gate is currently red on unrelated suites, so maintainers should review those separately before merge.