TRT-2647: rhcos10 default for 5.0#3498
Conversation
|
Pipeline controller notification For optional jobs, comment This repository is configured in: automatic mode |
|
@neisw: This pull request references TRT-2647 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "5.0.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
WalkthroughUpdates default OS variant for OpenShift 5.x/main to rhcos10 in variant registry fallback logic; config scenarios are adjusted to include rhcos10 (and a 5.0 comparison scenario is reworked). Tests updated to expect rhcos10 for affected jobs; one 4.22 techpreview comparison scenario removed. ChangesOS Variant Default Update for 5.0
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 15 | ❌ 2❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (15 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure. 🔧 golangci-lint (2.12.1)Error: can't load config: unsupported version of the configuration: "" See https://golangci-lint.run/docs/product/migration-guide for migration instructions Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
pkg/variantregistry/ocp_test.go (1)
1139-1161: ⚡ Quick winConsider adding a no-release
-main-sibling case for branch-fallback coverage.You now validate
-master-with no release (rhcos10). Adding a matching-main-no-release case would close the parity gap forisMainBranch.✅ Suggested test addition
{ job: "periodic-ci-openshift-master-no-release-version-e2e-aws-ovn", expected: map[string]string{ VariantArch: "amd64", VariantInstaller: "ipi", VariantPlatform: "aws", VariantNetwork: "ovn", VariantNetworkStack: "ipv4", VariantOwner: "eng", VariantSuite: "unknown", VariantTopology: "ha", VariantUpgrade: VariantNoValue, VariantAggregation: VariantNoValue, VariantProcedure: "none", VariantJobTier: "candidate", VariantFeatureSet: VariantDefaultValue, VariantNetworkAccess: VariantDefaultValue, VariantScheduler: VariantDefaultValue, VariantSecurityMode: VariantDefaultValue, VariantCGroupMode: "v2", VariantLayeredProduct: VariantNoValue, VariantOS: "rhcos10", }, }, + { + job: "periodic-ci-openshift-main-no-release-version-e2e-aws-ovn", + expected: map[string]string{ + VariantArch: "amd64", + VariantInstaller: "ipi", + VariantPlatform: "aws", + VariantNetwork: "ovn", + VariantNetworkStack: "ipv4", + VariantOwner: "eng", + VariantSuite: "unknown", + VariantTopology: "ha", + VariantUpgrade: VariantNoValue, + VariantAggregation: VariantNoValue, + VariantProcedure: "none", + VariantJobTier: "candidate", + VariantFeatureSet: VariantDefaultValue, + VariantNetworkAccess: VariantDefaultValue, + VariantScheduler: VariantDefaultValue, + VariantSecurityMode: VariantDefaultValue, + VariantCGroupMode: "v2", + VariantLayeredProduct: VariantNoValue, + VariantOS: "rhcos10", + }, + },🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@pkg/variantregistry/ocp_test.go` around lines 1139 - 1161, Add a sibling test case to the table in ocp_test.go that mirrors the existing "periodic-ci-openshift-master-no-release-version-e2e-aws-ovn" case but uses "periodic-ci-openshift-main-no-release-version-e2e-aws-ovn" as the job name to exercise the isMainBranch path; copy the expected map (VariantArch, VariantInstaller, VariantPlatform, VariantNetwork, VariantNetworkStack, VariantOwner, VariantSuite, VariantTopology, VariantUpgrade, VariantAggregation, VariantProcedure, VariantJobTier, VariantFeatureSet, VariantNetworkAccess, VariantScheduler, VariantSecurityMode, VariantCGroupMode, VariantLayeredProduct, VariantOS) from the master case so the assertion logic in the test (table-driven test around the job field) verifies parity for main-branch fallback.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Nitpick comments:
In `@pkg/variantregistry/ocp_test.go`:
- Around line 1139-1161: Add a sibling test case to the table in ocp_test.go
that mirrors the existing
"periodic-ci-openshift-master-no-release-version-e2e-aws-ovn" case but uses
"periodic-ci-openshift-main-no-release-version-e2e-aws-ovn" as the job name to
exercise the isMainBranch path; copy the expected map (VariantArch,
VariantInstaller, VariantPlatform, VariantNetwork, VariantNetworkStack,
VariantOwner, VariantSuite, VariantTopology, VariantUpgrade, VariantAggregation,
VariantProcedure, VariantJobTier, VariantFeatureSet, VariantNetworkAccess,
VariantScheduler, VariantSecurityMode, VariantCGroupMode, VariantLayeredProduct,
VariantOS) from the master case so the assertion logic in the test (table-driven
test around the job field) verifies parity for main-branch fallback.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited)
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Enterprise
Run ID: 683d6765-f56e-45e2-9847-79272263d51c
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
pkg/variantregistry/ocp_test.gopkg/variantregistry/snapshot.yaml
|
/hold |
|
Scheduling required tests: |
|
@neisw: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: neisw, petr-muller The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Staging for when the default changes over to rhcos10 for 5.0
Open question, should we remove
OS:from the 5.0 main view so they are all picked up by default or explicitly specify rhcos9 and rhcos10?Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores