USHIFT-6800: Add c2cc reboot tests#6943
Conversation
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
jira/valid-reference
|
@vimauro: This pull request references USHIFT-6800 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "5.0.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/label tide/merge-method-squash |
|
Note Reviews pausedIt looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the Use the following commands to manage reviews:
Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited) Review profile: CHILL Plan: Enterprise Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
WalkthroughAdds C2CC reboot coverage with new helper keywords, a reboot-focused Robot suite, expanded post-reboot verification, and scenario entrypoints that run the broader C2CC suite directory. ChangesC2CC reboot scenarios
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes Suggested labels
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 14 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (14 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
openshift-ci
Bot
added
the
tide/merge-method-squash
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: vimauro The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@vimauro: This pull request references USHIFT-6800 which is a valid jira issue. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@test/resources/c2cc.resource`:
- Around line 456-458: The re-registration flow in the remote cluster setup is
mutating `${C2CC_REMOTE_ALIASES}` before `Register Remote Cluster` succeeds,
which can leave teardown state inconsistent if that keyword fails. Update the
logic around `Remove Values From List` and `Register Remote Cluster` so the
alias is only removed after a successful re-registration, or use `TRY/FINALLY`
to restore/reconcile `${C2CC_REMOTE_ALIASES}` on failure. Keep the
teardown-tracked alias list in sync in the re-registration path used by `Wait
Until Keyword Succeeds`.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited)
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Enterprise
Run ID: 52322569-b28b-466c-bc7a-ba41b45857c4
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
test/resources/c2cc.resourcetest/suites/c2cc/reboot.robot
| ${kubeconfig}= Get From Dictionary ${C2CC_KUBECONFIGS} ${alias} | ||
| Remove Values From List ${C2CC_REMOTE_ALIASES} ${alias} | ||
| Register Remote Cluster ${alias} ${host} ${port} ${kubeconfig} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🩺 Stability & Availability | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win
Re-registration is not failure-safe for teardown.
Remove Values From List drops the alias from ${C2CC_REMOTE_ALIASES} before Register Remote Cluster re-adds it. If Register Remote Cluster errors (host still down), the alias is gone from the tracked list. Within Wait Until Keyword Succeeds retries this self-heals, but if all retries exhaust, Teardown All Remote Clusters will never switch to / close that connection, leaking it and leaving teardown state inconsistent.
Consider only mutating the tracking list after a successful re-registration, or guarding with TRY/FINALLY so the list is reconciled even on the failure path.
Based on learnings: teardown state (the alias/interface list consumed by teardown keywords) must be populated reliably even when the mutating keyword errors before completing.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@test/resources/c2cc.resource` around lines 456 - 458, The re-registration
flow in the remote cluster setup is mutating `${C2CC_REMOTE_ALIASES}` before
`Register Remote Cluster` succeeds, which can leave teardown state inconsistent
if that keyword fails. Update the logic around `Remove Values From List` and
`Register Remote Cluster` so the alias is only removed after a successful
re-registration, or use `TRY/FINALLY` to restore/reconcile
`${C2CC_REMOTE_ALIASES}` on failure. Keep the teardown-tracked alias list in
sync in the re-registration path used by `Wait Until Keyword Succeeds`.
Source: Learnings
|
/retest |
1 similar comment
|
/retest |
|
@vimauro unfortunatelly the tests you added were not exected. The fix you can add is to remove the |
coderabbitai
Bot
added
the
ready-for-human-review
|
@vimauro: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
4 participants
Summary by CodeRabbit