Skip to content

Conversation

@blublinsky
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Type of change

  • Refactor
  • New feature
  • Bug fix
  • CVE fix
  • Optimization
  • Documentation Update
  • Configuration Update
  • Bump-up dependent library

Related Tickets & Documents

Checklist before requesting a review

  • I have performed a self-review of my code.
  • PR has passed all pre-merge test jobs.
  • If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.

Testing

  • Please provide detailed steps to perform tests related to this code change.
  • How were the fix/results from this change verified? Please provide relevant screenshots or results.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 16, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign joshuawilson for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Dec 17, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Dec 17, 2025
@blublinsky blublinsky force-pushed the deployment-config branch 6 times, most recently from 061e560 to 2084812 Compare December 19, 2025 13:57
@blublinsky
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@blublinsky
Copy link
Contributor Author

/override "Red Hat Konflux / operator-e2e-tests-419 / ols-bundle"

This failure is because the bundle is pointing to the older version of the operator. The same test passes here ci/prow/bundle-e2e-4-20 with the latest operator code.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 20, 2025

@blublinsky: Overrode contexts on behalf of blublinsky: Red Hat Konflux / operator-e2e-tests-419 / ols-bundle

Details

In response to this:

/override "Red Hat Konflux / operator-e2e-tests-419 / ols-bundle"

This failure is because the bundle is pointing to the older version of the operator. The same test passes here ci/prow/bundle-e2e-4-20 with the latest operator code.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@blublinsky
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 23, 2025

@blublinsky: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants