NO-JIRA: add custom coderabbit config

[opokornyy]

Add custom coderabbit config

Categories

• Bugfix
• Data Enhancement
• Feature
• Backporting
• Others (CI, Infrastructure, Documentation)

Sample Archive

• None

Documentation

• None

Unit Tests

• None

Privacy

Yes. There are no sensitive data in the newly collected information.

Changelog

Breaking Changes

No

References

• None

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Introduced configuration to enable automated pull-request review behaviors, including collapsing lengthy file listings by default and generating high-level PR overviews to streamline reviews and reduce manual effort. This update improves review readability and automates summary generation for incoming changes.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@opokornyy: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Add custom coderabbit config

Categories

• Bugfix
• Data Enhancement
• Feature
• Backporting
• Others (CI, Infrastructure, Documentation)

Sample Archive

• None

Documentation

• None

Unit Tests

• None

Privacy

Yes. There are no sensitive data in the newly collected information.

Changelog

Breaking Changes

No

References

• None

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds a new .coderabbit.yaml configuration file with settings to collapse the walkthrough table by default and enable generation of a high-level PR summary.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Configuration Settings ./.coderabbit.yaml	Added review automation options: reviews.collapse_walkthrough: true and reviews.high_level_summary: true, enabling collapsed walkthroughs and high-level summary generation for PRs.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 I hopped in the repo, tidy and spry,
I tucked a small config where reviewers fly,
Walkthroughs now folded, summaries bright,
Automation hums through the quiet night. ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly summarizes the main change: adding a custom coderabbit configuration file. It is concise and specific about the primary purpose of the PR.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description follows the required template structure with all major sections completed, including category selection (Others), and appropriate 'None' entries for non-applicable sections.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Merge Conflict Detection	✅ Passed	✅ No merge conflicts detected when merging into master

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents

In @.coderabbit.yaml:
- Line 5: Remove the invalid auto_description entry from the config: the reviews
schema disallows additionalProperties so auto_description should be deleted;
instead rely on high_level_summary: true (already present) and ensure your PR
template includes the high_level_summary_placeholder (default "@coderabbitai
summary") to auto-populate the PR description with the summary.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

.coderabbit.yaml (1)

3-4: These options are set to their default values.

Both collapse_walkthrough and high_level_summary default to true per the schema. Explicitly setting them is redundant but harmless—useful if you want to document intent or guard against future default changes.

[opokornyy]

/cc @ncaak

[opokornyy]

/retest

[ncaak]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ncaak, opokornyy

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [ncaak,opokornyy]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[opokornyy]

/retest

[opokornyy]

/retest

[opokornyy]

/retest

[opokornyy]

/retest

[opokornyy]

/verified by @opokornyy

[openshift-ci-robot]

@opokornyy: This PR has been marked as verified by @opokornyy.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by @opokornyy

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[BaiyangZhou]

/override pull-ci-openshift-insights-operator-master-lint

[openshift-ci]

@BaiyangZhou: Overrode contexts on behalf of BaiyangZhou: ci/prow/lint

Details

In response to this:

/override pull-ci-openshift-insights-operator-master-lint

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[openshift-ci]

@opokornyy: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.