-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 104
MON-4472: Migrate Prometheus targets discovering from Endpoints to EndpointsSlices #638
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
machine424
wants to merge
1
commit into
openshift:main
Choose a base branch
from
machine424:endpoint
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -31,3 +31,4 @@ spec: | |
| selector: | ||
| matchLabels: | ||
| app: openshift-apiserver-operator | ||
| serviceDiscoveryRole: EndpointSlice | ||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -19,6 +19,14 @@ rules: | |
| - get | ||
| - list | ||
| - watch | ||
| - apiGroups: | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. could we remove rbac for endpoints ? |
||
| - discovery.k8s.io | ||
| resources: | ||
| - endpointslices | ||
| verbs: | ||
| - get | ||
| - list | ||
| - watch | ||
| --- | ||
| apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1 | ||
| kind: RoleBinding | ||
|
|
@@ -90,3 +98,4 @@ spec: | |
| selector: | ||
| matchLabels: | ||
| prometheus: openshift-apiserver | ||
| serviceDiscoveryRole: EndpointSlice | ||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
could we remove rbac for
endpoints?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choosing the conservative approach in case we forget to set
serviceDiscoveryRole: EndpointSliceon some hidden ServiceMonitor and CI doesn’t warn us about it.If we can be confident that no other
ServiceMonitorneeds/relies on those roles, we can safely remove the permissions for sure.That being said, both resources should contain/provide the same data, RO rbac for endpoints will not really be more permissive...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are we planning to review these permissions in the future?
I just want to understand and confirm whether unused RBAC permissions will be removed later on.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
once we're confident that no other ServiceMonitor (that wasn't migrated in this PR) relies on those RBAC. Yes.