Skip to content

feat(conversations): /mine command and assignee filter#23

Merged
one-ea merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
260629-feat-my-conversations
Jun 29, 2026
Merged

feat(conversations): /mine command and assignee filter#23
one-ea merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
260629-feat-my-conversations

Conversation

@one-ea

@one-ea one-ea commented Jun 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • ConversationService.listByAssignee(adminId, limit) — quick lookup of conversations assigned to a specific admin
  • listConversations extended with assignedTo filter parameter
  • /mine command in Topic — lists conversations assigned to the caller (up to 20), showing contact name, status, and last message time
  • /operations/conversations web page — new "负责人 ID" filter input alongside existing status filter
  • Filter links and pagination preserve both status and assigned_to query params

Problem

/assign existed but there was no way for an admin to quickly find "my conversations". In multi-admin teams, an admin had to scroll through all topics or use SQL to find conversations assigned to them.

Verification

  • npm run verify passed (check + 49 tests + audit 0 vulns)
  • 1 new test case: listByAssignee accuracy, combined status+assignee filter, empty result

- Add ConversationService.listByAssignee for quick lookup by admin
- Extend listConversations with assignedTo filter parameter
- Add /mine command in Topic: lists conversations assigned to caller
- Add assigned_to filter input on /operations/conversations web page
- Filter links preserve assigned_to when switching status tabs
- Pagination preserves both status and assigned_to filters
Co-authored-by: monkeycode-ai <monkeycode-ai@chaitin.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@one-ea, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 43 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 6bdd8db0-df01-41f6-aeaa-d870337e3c44

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c79c322 and 4a559c3.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • src/channels/telegram/commands.ts
  • src/domain/conversations.ts
  • src/runtime/main.ts
  • src/runtime/web-console.ts
  • test/core.test.ts
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch 260629-feat-my-conversations

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@one-ea one-ea merged commit e4cb408 into main Jun 29, 2026
4 checks passed
@one-ea one-ea deleted the 260629-feat-my-conversations branch June 29, 2026 20:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants