Skip to content

Conversation

@matentzn
Copy link
Contributor

All orphaned classes are placed under BFO classes for now. This is a precursor for COB alignment. (BFO:0000015 is a COB class). I placed the weird "life cycle temporal boundary" class under BFO:entity for now as a stop gap - We will probably deprecate all of these (discussion ongoing), or else find a better home in COB.

See #2301

All orphaned classes are placed under BFO classes for now. This is a precursor for COB alignment. (BFO:0000015 is a COB class). I placed the weird "life cycle temporal boundary" class under BFO:entity for now as a stop gap - We will probably deprecate all of these (discussion ongoing), or else find a better home in COB.
@cmungall
Copy link
Member

I would prefer to avoid confusing dangling classes, can we resolve #3488 first

@matentzn
Copy link
Contributor Author

I would prefer to avoid confusing dangling classes, can we resolve #3488 first

I feel like this will hold up this issue here unnecessarily. Its on the roadmap though - but I want to clean up Uberon for my COB Workshop presentation and the boundary issue is a bit of a red herring here. I would still prefer we deal with this here first, and I will do the boundaries as an issue totally isolated from all other concerns..

@matentzn matentzn self-assigned this Jan 22, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants