-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 226
Cleanup and Model Improvements #11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Cheaper metric calc, cleanup
|
Dear all Thanks for your great contribution. I am impressed by your wonderful efforts to improve Graph Wavenet. I will review the codes as soon as possible. Bests |
|
Dear all, I think you have done a very good job. To respect your contribution mostly, I would highly recommend to keep your own repository and not merge into the project. I will instead add a link referring to your repo. Best regards, |
Changes that improve performance to 3.00 - 3.02 test MAE:
cat_feat_gc=TrueStandardScalerChanges that don't affect performance:
--savespecifies a directory.--savefor reproducibilitytrain.pyskip batches where all targets are 0: they will certainly have 0 loss.best_model.pth. Dont need to retrain to inspect.Metrics:
baseline: 3.00 - 3.02
finetuning: 2.99-3.00
Paper has more details on experiments that didn't work: http://arxiv.org/abs/1912.07390