Skip to content

feat(API): Support read/write signals X-Y#176

Open
epage wants to merge 2 commits intoni:masterfrom
epage:xy
Open

feat(API): Support read/write signals X-Y#176
epage wants to merge 2 commits intoni:masterfrom
epage:xy

Conversation

@epage
Copy link
Contributor

@epage epage commented Aug 4, 2017 •
edited by bcornish
Loading

TODO

  • Make example work 1
  • Integration test 2
  • Decide if its XY or Xy in PascalCase. 1
  • Update readme 3
  • Update example documentation 3

Checklist

  • This contribution adheres to CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • New tests have been created for any new features or regression tests for bugfixes.
  • tox successfully runs, including unit tests and style checks (see CONTRIBUTING.md).

epage
epage commented Aug 7, 2017
View reviewed changes
nixnet/session.py
"SignalOutSinglePointSession"]
"SignalOutSinglePointSession",
"SignalInXYSession",
"SignalOutXYSession"]
Copy link
Contributor Author

@epage epage Aug 7, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should it be SignalInXYSession or SignalInXySession?

PEP-8 only says to use CapWords. In newer python stdlib code, ABCMeta caps each part of an acronym.

So far we've been following the convention of not putting acronyms in caps.

Does XY count as an acronym (Xy) or two separate "words" (XY)?

Copy link
Contributor

@bcornish bcornish Aug 29, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So I read "XY" as sort of "X and Y" which would make me inclined to lean more towards XY.

@epage
feat(API): Support read/write signals X-Y
51e394e 
`time_limit` is a good example of why we should rely on both C and LV
documentation for writing documentation for the Python API.  The C
documentation left off what happens if `time_limit` is invalid.
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 7, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.7%) to 64.878% when pulling 8bc0344 on epage:xy into 5590c92 on ni:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 8, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.7%) to 64.915% when pulling 18a5c68 on epage:xy into d7d9fc9 on ni:master.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 8, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.7%) to 64.915% when pulling 18a5c68 on epage:xy into d7d9fc9 on ni:master.

@d-bohls d-bohls assigned d-bohls and unassigned bcornish Feb 5, 2018
@epage epage mentioned this pull request May 15, 2018
Closed
@salehcDA
Copy link

salehcDA commented Sep 18, 2023

Are there any plans to continue development on this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

1 more reviewer

@bcornish bcornish bcornish left review comments

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@epage @coveralls @salehcDA @bcornish @d-bohls