Add Python 3.13 Support

[ni-jfitzger]

• This contribution adheres to CONTRIBUTING.md.
• I've updated CHANGELOG.md if applicable.
• I've added tests applicable for this pull request

What does this Pull Request accomplish?

1. Adds official Python 3.13 support to nimi-python through testing.
   The version of Python used by readthedocs for documentataion generation remains unchanged at 3.11. I prefer to be intentional about changes to the generation of documentation.

2. Update grpcio, grpcio-tools, protobuf deps for Python 3.13 compatibility and regenerate .pb2 files.

grpcio-tools compatibility for version 1.67.0 (The earliest version witha a 3.13 wheel)

• grpcio >= grpcio-tools version
• protobuf >=4.21.6?
  • Not so sure about this. I think it may need to be bumped. The generated pb2 files seem to require protobuf 5.27.2.

List issues fixed by this Pull Request below, if any.

• Fix Add Python 3.13 support and loosen protobuf version constraint #2075

What testing has been done?

PR Checks

[ni-jfitzger]

I'm not sure if this will work. We may need to bump it to 5.27.2, based on the failure to import nifake with protobuf 5.26.1.

[codecov-commenter]

⚠️ Please install the to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.35%. Comparing base (dd57eae) to head (c08c515).

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2077      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.33%   91.35%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          66       66              
  Lines       16274    16292      +18     
==========================================
+ Hits        14864    14883      +19     
+ Misses       1410     1409       -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
codegenunittests	84.95% <ø> (ø)
nidcpowersystemtests	94.59% <ø> (+0.04%)	⬆️
nidcpowerunittests	89.53% <ø> (ø)
nidigitalsystemtests	92.26% <100.00%> (+0.05%)	⬆️
nidigitalunittests	68.44% <66.66%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
nidmmsystemtests	92.72% <ø> (ø)
nifakeunittests	87.24% <ø> (ø)
nifgensystemtests	94.86% <ø> (ø)
nimodinstsystemtests	73.85% <ø> (ø)
nimodinstunittests	94.20% <ø> (ø)
niscopesystemtests	92.94% <ø> (ø)
niscopeunittests	43.20% <ø> (ø)
nisesystemtests	91.50% <ø> (ø)
niswitchsystemtests	82.03% <ø> (ø)
nitclksystemtests	94.87% <ø> (ø)
nitclkunittests	98.26% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
generated/nidigital/nidigital/_library.py	95.04% <100.00%> (+0.05%)	⬆️
...erated/nidigital/nidigital/_library_interpreter.py	90.37% <100.00%> (+0.07%)	⬆️
generated/nidigital/nidigital/session.py	95.92% <100.00%> (+0.01%)	⬆️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update dd57eae...c08c515. Read the comment docs.

[ni-jfitzger]

Well this is a very unclean set of commits. I'll need to redo this PR.