Skip to content

docs(auditor/10.9): revise Oracle Database configuration and requirements#1020

Open
pavelshabanov2025 wants to merge 4 commits into
release/auditor_10.9from
pt4/pshabanov/oracle-v2
Open

docs(auditor/10.9): revise Oracle Database configuration and requirements#1020
pavelshabanov2025 wants to merge 4 commits into
release/auditor_10.9from
pt4/pshabanov/oracle-v2

Conversation

@pavelshabanov2025
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Follow-up revision of Oracle Database documentation for Auditor 10.9, addressing
reviewer feedback on PR #679.

Changes per reviewer feedback

  • overview.md — removed mention of automatic native audit configuration
    (the feature was removed; configuration is now manual-only)
  • permissions.md — full rewrite: added Prerequisites section, restructured
    into numbered steps, added explicit DBA Role section with CAUTION, added
    Required Object Privileges table per reviewer request
  • verifysettings.md — split Oracle 19c row: ENTITY_NAME/ENABLED_OPTION
    columns for 19c/21c/23c vs deprecated USER_NAME/ENABLED_OPT for 12.2/18c;
    removed Oracle 11g Standard Auditing row
  • unified.md — deleted: article covers migration from 11g to Unified Auditing,
    which is irrelevant for 10.9 (minimum supported version is 12.2, Unified
    Auditing is available natively)

Additional fixes

  • database.md — restored HTML table formatting in Step 3 (Unified Auditing
    commands were collapsed into unformatted text)
  • software.md, supporteddatasources.md — removed remaining Oracle 11g and
    12c references carried over from PR Auditor/ps/oracle11 #679

Generated with AI

Co-Authored-By: Claude claude-sonnet-4-6 noreply@anthropic.com
Co-Authored-By: Claude Code ai@netwrix.com

…ents

- overview.md: removed mention of automatic native audit configuration
- permissions.md: full rewrite — Prerequisites, numbered steps, DBA Role
  section with CAUTION, Required Object Privileges table; removed 12c refs
- verifysettings.md: split Oracle 19c row (ENTITY_NAME/ENABLED_OPTION for
  19c/21c/23c vs USER_NAME/ENABLED_OPT for 12.2/18c); removed 11g row
- unified.md: deleted — irrelevant for 10.9 (min version 12.2 has Unified
  Auditing natively)
- database.md: restored HTML table formatting in Step 3
- software.md, supporteddatasources.md: removed Oracle 11g and 12c references

Generated with AI

Co-Authored-By: Claude claude-sonnet-4-6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Code <ai@netwrix.com>
@pavelshabanov2025 pavelshabanov2025 requested a review from a team as a code owner May 27, 2026 07:43
Comment thread docs/auditor/10.9/configuration/oracle/database.md Outdated

- Configure Oracle Database 12c, 18c, 19c for Auditing
- Configure Oracle Database 11g for Auditing
## Configure Oracle Database 12.2, 18c, 19c, Database 21c On-Premise, 23c for Auditing
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

probably, Audit Configuration for Oracle Database 12c, 18c, 19c, on-premises 21c, and 23c is better structured. and i'm not sure about on-premises 21c, why only this one emphasized?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed: updated to 'Configure Oracle Database 12c, 18c, 19c, 21c, 23c for Auditing'. Removed 'on-premises' qualifier from 21c.

Comment thread docs/auditor/10.9/configuration/oracle/database.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/auditor/10.9/configuration/oracle/database.md
Comment thread docs/auditor/10.9/configuration/oracle/database.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/auditor/10.9/configuration/oracle/permissions.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/auditor/10.9/configuration/oracle/permissions.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/auditor/10.9/configuration/oracle/verifysettings.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/auditor/10.9/requirements/supporteddatasources/supporteddatasources.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/auditor/10.9/requirements/software.md Outdated
pavelshabanov2025 and others added 2 commits May 29, 2026 14:10
…guration

- Replace Oracle Database version 12.2 with 12c across all affected files
- Remove "On-Premise" qualifier from version 21c references
- Rewrite incomplete heading to "To configure Unified Auditing for Oracle Database 12c, 18c, 19c, 21c, and 23c:"
- Fix missing subject: "Netwrix Auditor lists these conflicts"
- Clarify 12c Release 2 (12.2.0.1) in permissions table
- Clarify Fine Grained Auditing is used in addition to Unified Auditing, not as a replacement
- Fix ascending version order in overview.md table

Generated with AI

Co-Authored-By: Claude Code <ai@netwrix.com>
Updated supported data sources list to display Oracle Database versions
from oldest to newest (12c to 23c).

Generated with AI

Co-Authored-By: Claude Code <ai@netwrix.com>
Currently, Netwrix Auditor checks audit settings for Unified Auditing when compatibility is enabled
for `ACTIONS`. If any of your current settings conflict with the audit configuration required for
Netwrix Auditor, these conflicts will be listed in the Netwrix Auditor System Health event log.
Netwrix Auditor lists these conflicts in the System Health event log.
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it's understandable, but sounds unnatural, probably, "If any of your current settings conflict with the audit configuration required for Netwrix Auditor, these conflicts are listed in the System Health event log" is better

Restored grammatically correct sentence structure per reviewer suggestion:
"If any of your current settings conflict with the audit configuration
required for Netwrix Auditor, these conflicts are listed in the System
Health event log."

Generated with AI

Co-Authored-By: Claude Code <ai@netwrix.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants