Skip to content

DNM: NITX Feature #47

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Draft
vertose wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

DNM: NITX Feature #47

vertose wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

@vertose
Copy link

@vertose vertose commented May 3, 2022 •
edited
Loading

  • Define transaction models
  • Bulletproof Updates
  • Transaction model serialization
  • Migrate database output positions from commitment-based keys to ID-based
  • Migrate database spent block hashes from commitment-based keys to ID-based
  • MMR changes to support additional output fields
  • Stealth balance checks
  • Stealth excess signature checks
  • Update mempool to index by output ID
  • Non-interactive transaction creation (libtx)
  • Update APIs

vertose added 3 commits May 3, 2022 06:02
@vertose
defining transaction models
9e5a88f 
(cherry picked from commit 4d25ff2)
@vertose
migrate output positions to id-based keys
9eb8a36 
(cherry picked from commit 8db5e4b)
@vertose
migrate spent commitments to ids and finish moving all input and outp…
fdfa242 
…ut handling to id-based (sans APIs and a few tests)
@vertose vertose changed the title DNM: defining transaction models DNM: NITX Feature May 27, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@vertose