EdgeRatio()

[ms609]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

Performance benchmark results

Call	Status	Change	Time (ms)
as.Splits(bigTrees)	⚪ NSD	3.16%	22.3 → 21.7, 21.4
as.Splits(someTrees)	⚪ NSD	0.19%	11.9 → 11.8, 11.9
Consensus(forest1k.888, check = FALSE)	⚪ NSD	0.08%	100 → 99.7, 100
Consensus(forest201.80, check = FALSE)	⚪ NSD	-2%	4.11 → 4.19, 4.2
Consensus(forest21.260, 0.5, FALSE)	⚪ NSD	-1.55%	1.23 → 1.25, 1.25
Consensus(forest21.260)	⚪ NSD	-1.52%	1.25 → 1.27, 1.27
Consensus(forestMaj, 0.5, FALSE)	⚪ NSD	-1.6%	3 → 3.05, 3.05
DropTip(tr2000, 5)	⚪ NSD	-0.52%	17.8 → 17.9, 17.9
DropTip(tr80, 5)	⚪ NSD	1.23%	0.109 → 0.108, 0.107
DropTip(unlen2k, 5)	⚪ NSD	-0.96%	0.216 → 0.219, 0.218
DropTip(unlen80, 5)	⚪ NSD	-0.35%	0.0404 → 0.0404, 0.0407
lapply(bigSplits, as.phylo)	⚪ NSD	-0.3%	31.3 → 31.5, 31.3
lapply(someSplits, as.phylo)	⚪ NSD	-1.3%	14.4 → 14.3, 14.6
PathLengths(tr2000, full = TRUE)	⚪ NSD	0.37%	17.3 → 17.2, 17.1
PathLengths(tr80, full = TRUE)	⚪ NSD	1.51%	0.118 → 0.117, 0.117
PathLengths(tr80Unif, full = TRUE)	⚪ NSD	1.78%	0.121 → 0.119, 0.118
RootTree(tr2000, 5)	⚪ NSD	2.29%	0.397 → 0.383, 0.394
RootTree(tr80, c("t3", "t36"))	⚪ NSD	-0.85%	0.0709 → 0.0714, 0.0716
RootTree(tr80, "t3")	⚪ NSD	0.97%	0.0507 → 0.0503, 0.0501
RootTree(tr80, "t30")	⚪ NSD	0.73%	0.0509 → 0.0505, 0.0506
RootTree(unlen2k, 5)	⚪ NSD	0.93%	0.335 → 0.335, 0.328
RootTree(unlen80, c("t3", "t36"))	⚪ NSD	0.33%	0.0662 → 0.0666, 0.0653
RootTree(unlen80, "t3")	⚪ NSD	0.14%	0.0436 → 0.044, 0.0431
RootTree(unlen80, "t30")	⚪ NSD	-0.32%	0.0439 → 0.0444, 0.0436
TreeDist::RobinsonFoulds(forest201.80)	⚪ NSD	-0.96%	16.8 → 17.1, 16.9
TreeDist::RobinsonFoulds(forest21.888)	⚪ NSD	0.4%	3.42 → 3.4, 3.39
TreeTools:::path_lengths(tr80$edge, tr80$edge.length, FALSE)	⚪ NSD	1.08%	0.107 → 0.105, 0.106
TreeTools:::postorder_order(bal40)	⚪ NSD	-0.57%	0.00176 → 0.00177, 0.00177
TreeTools:::postorder_order(bal40k)	⚪ NSD	0.18%	0.435 → 0.435, 0.433
TreeTools:::postorder_order(dbal40)	⚪ NSD	-0.05%	0.00189 → 0.00189, 0.00189
TreeTools:::postorder_order(dbal40k)	⚪ NSD	0.59%	2.39 → 2.4, 2.35
TreeTools:::postorder_order(dpec40)	⚪ NSD	-0.32%	0.00309 → 0.0031, 0.00309
TreeTools:::postorder_order(dpec40k)	⚪ NSD	-0.03%	3620 → 3620, 3620
TreeTools:::postorder_order(drnd80)	⚪ NSD	-0.56%	0.00519 → 0.00522, 0.00521
TreeTools:::postorder_order(nbal40)	⚪ NSD	-0.4%	0.00223 → 0.00223, 0.00222
TreeTools:::postorder_order(nbal40k)	⚪ NSD	0.15%	2.42 → 2.44, 2.37
TreeTools:::postorder_order(npec40)	⚪ NSD	-0.3%	0.00338 → 0.00339, 0.00338
TreeTools:::postorder_order(npec40k)	🟣 ~same	-0.14%	3630 → 3630, 3630
TreeTools:::postorder_order(nrnd80)	⚪ NSD	0.02%	0.00573 → 0.00576, 0.0057
TreeTools:::postorder_order(pec40)	⚪ NSD	-0.01%	0.00174 → 0.00175, 0.00173
TreeTools:::postorder_order(pec40k)	⚪ NSD	0.61%	0.435 → 0.433, 0.432
TreeTools:::postorder_order(rnd80)	⚪ NSD	0.01%	0.0022 → 0.0022, 0.00219

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 96.20%. Comparing base (7e5f175) to head (be82165).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #253   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.19%   96.20%           
=======================================
  Files          75       76    +1     
  Lines        5618     5632   +14     
=======================================
+ Hits         5404     5418   +14     
  Misses        214      214           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.