Lfo timing

[friedolino78]

No description provided.

[fundamental]

As per some other PRs the schema changes are larger than I'd expect. Also of note within the schema changes I can see some of the envelope default values have changed. That seems to smell of a possible bug to me.

I do like the general idea of lfo fade in/fade out as the delayed start LFO always felt somewhat jerky to me. Does the zyn/zyn side of this handle not starting the fade in until the delay time has elapsed? Also, how does the GUI look to you. I feel like with these additional knobs it might be looking somewhat claustrophobic.

[friedolino78]

i am confused. if i see this right, this feature was already merged via PR48

[friedolino78]

As per some other PRs the schema changes are larger than I'd expect. Also of note within the schema changes I can see some of the envelope default values have changed. That seems to smell of a possible bug to me.

I do like the general idea of lfo fade in/fade out as the delayed start LFO always felt somewhat jerky to me. Does the zyn/zyn side of this handle not starting the fade in until the delay time has elapsed? Also, how does the GUI look to you. I feel like with these additional knobs it might be looking somewhat claustrophobic.

yes. it makes me afraid of adding more features ;-)
no idea how to solve the screen space issue. maybe we should ask the GOF if there are design patterns for this problem.

[fundamental]

No idea with the screen space issue. It's one reason I've been hesitant with features. The only major one I've tried to push for is the user visible scopes which does eat up a lot of screen space, but it's less interactive, so I guess I view it differently.