Skip to content

Building with latest deepmind/mujoco (2.3.0) and OMPL (1.5.0)#4

Open
zkytony wants to merge 8 commits intompflueger:masterfrom
zkytony:zkytony/fix
Open

Building with latest deepmind/mujoco (2.3.0) and OMPL (1.5.0)#4
zkytony wants to merge 8 commits intompflueger:masterfrom
zkytony:zkytony/fix

Conversation

@zkytony
Copy link

@zkytony zkytony commented Dec 6, 2022

Thank you for creating this awesome package!

MuJoCo is now open source and maintained by Deepmind. I modified the CMakeLists.txt a bit to allow building this repo with the latest release of deepmind/mujoco (2.3.0) and OMPL (1.5.0).

I also updated the README instructions for building and using this package. Please check whether it works for you and for correctness. Also, I have only tried the new build on Ubuntu 20.04. If necessary, please verify this with Mac.

Consider advancing this repo by merging this PR. Thanks!

@aravindsiv
Copy link

Hi @zkytony,

I was also trying to get the library to work with the deepmind/mujoco repository, so thanks for this pull request!

Are you planning to add any other changes or need any help with them?

@zkytony
Copy link
Author

zkytony commented Dec 9, 2022

Hi @aravindsiv that's awesome. Not really, but I just wanted to see if this works with mujoco_menagerie models. I am not proficient with mujoco or OMPL. Still learning. Help would be great if you could test this with menagerie as well!

@zkytony
Copy link
Author

zkytony commented Dec 9, 2022

I merged the changes here to the master branch of my fork: https://github.com/zkytony/mujoco-ompl

@aravindsiv
Copy link

Hi @zkytony I compiled with mujoco 2.3.0 using your fork. Some of the mujoco menagerie models are free joints - which currently look like they are not supported in this library.

@mpflueger Was there a reason behind this design choice?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants