Fix Issue 104: supply original BSD-style license

[bbadour]

I located the original LICENSE file content that accompanied dictionary.go and appended it to the LICENSE file here.

[thaJeztah]

Adding it inside the Apache license is probably confusing; the project is Apache licensed (which allows including MIT licensed code); given that effectively the spdy directory as a whole was MIT licensed, what we can do (and have done elsewhere) is to add a copy of the MIT LICENSE file in that subdirectory.

[dims]

i agree with @thaJeztah

[bbadour]

The lawyers where I work appreciate having all license texts that apply to a project in a single file at the root of the project. The header just says "the LICENSE". Sometimes they specify it's in the root; this one doesn't.

I have no objection if someone wants to break it out into a separate file. I can work with it where-ever you put it.

[bbadour]

P.S. If the other contents of the spdy/ directory are MIT licensed, that's a third license that might need mentioning somewhere. I didn't notice any mention of MIT in any of those files.

[thaJeztah]

P.S. If the other contents of the spdy/ directory are MIT licensed, that's a third license that might need mentioning somewhere. I didn't notice any mention of MIT in any of those files.

Ah, sorry, I posted from my phone and meant BSD, not MIT 🙈

I also did a bit of searching, and opened #106 as alternative; happy to hear if that works for you; I added you as co-author, but let me know if you prefer to not have that 👍