Skip to content

Conversation

@archana25-ms
Copy link
Contributor

@archana25-ms archana25-ms commented Dec 29, 2025

Merge Checklist

All boxes should be checked before merging the PR (just tick any boxes which don't apply to this PR)

  • The toolchain has been rebuilt successfully (or no changes were made to it)
  • The toolchain/worker package manifests are up-to-date
  • Any updated packages successfully build (or no packages were changed)
  • Packages depending on static components modified in this PR (Golang, *-static subpackages, etc.) have had their Release tag incremented.
  • Package tests (%check section) have been verified with RUN_CHECK=y for existing SPEC files, or added to new SPEC files
  • All package sources are available
  • cgmanifest files are up-to-date and sorted (./cgmanifest.json, ./toolkit/scripts/toolchain/cgmanifest.json, .github/workflows/cgmanifest.json)
  • LICENSE-MAP files are up-to-date (./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/data/licenses.json, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSES-MAP.md, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSE-EXCEPTIONS.PHOTON)
  • All source files have up-to-date hashes in the *.signatures.json files
  • sudo make go-tidy-all and sudo make go-test-coverage pass
  • Documentation has been updated to match any changes to the build system
  • Ready to merge

Summary

What does the PR accomplish, why was it needed?
Upgrade net-snmp to 5.9.5.2 for CVE-2025-68615

Change Log
  • SPECS/net-snmp/net-snmp.spec
  • SPECS/net-snmp/net-snmp.signatures.json
  • cgmanifest.json
  • SPECS/frr/0001-Fix-frr-c90-complaint-error.patch
  • SPECS/frr/frr.spec
Does this affect the toolchain?

NO

Associated issues
  • #xxxx
Links to CVEs
Test Methodology
  • Pipeline build id: xxxx

@archana25-ms archana25-ms requested a review from a team as a code owner December 29, 2025 10:53
@archana25-ms archana25-ms marked this pull request as draft December 29, 2025 10:53
@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added Packaging fasttrack/2.0 PRs Destined for Azure Linux 2.0 labels Dec 29, 2025
@Kanishk-Bansal
Copy link
Contributor

/azurepipelines run

@Kanishk-Bansal Kanishk-Bansal marked this pull request as ready for review December 29, 2025 14:10
@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@realsdx
Copy link
Contributor

realsdx commented Dec 29, 2025

Buddy Build

@Kanishk-Bansal
Copy link
Contributor

/azurepipelines run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@Kanishk-Bansal Kanishk-Bansal marked this pull request as ready for review December 29, 2025 17:58
@Kanishk-Bansal
Copy link
Contributor

Build

@archana25-ms
Copy link
Contributor Author

Build

Build is successful

@Kanishk-Bansal
Copy link
Contributor

/azurepipeline run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@Kanishk-Bansal Kanishk-Bansal added CVEFixReadyForMaintainerReview When a CVE fix has been reviewed by release manager and is ready for stable maintainer review CVE-fixed-by-upgrade CVE fixed by package upgrade labels Dec 30, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CVE-fixed-by-upgrade CVE fixed by package upgrade CVEFixReadyForMaintainerReview When a CVE fix has been reviewed by release manager and is ready for stable maintainer review fasttrack/2.0 PRs Destined for Azure Linux 2.0 Packaging security

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants