Skip to content

Conversation

@jykanase
Copy link
Contributor

@jykanase jykanase commented Dec 26, 2025

Merge Checklist

All boxes should be checked before merging the PR (just tick any boxes which don't apply to this PR)

  • The toolchain has been rebuilt successfully (or no changes were made to it)
  • The toolchain/worker package manifests are up-to-date
  • Any updated packages successfully build (or no packages were changed)
  • Packages depending on static components modified in this PR (Golang, *-static subpackages, etc.) have had their Release tag incremented.
  • Package tests (%check section) have been verified with RUN_CHECK=y for existing SPEC files, or added to new SPEC files
  • All package sources are available
  • cgmanifest files are up-to-date and sorted (./cgmanifest.json, ./toolkit/scripts/toolchain/cgmanifest.json, .github/workflows/cgmanifest.json)
  • LICENSE-MAP files are up-to-date (./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/data/licenses.json, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSES-MAP.md, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSE-EXCEPTIONS.PHOTON)
  • All source files have up-to-date hashes in the *.signatures.json files
  • sudo make go-tidy-all and sudo make go-test-coverage pass
  • Documentation has been updated to match any changes to the build system
  • Ready to merge

Summary

patch ntopng for CVE-2021-44964
CVE-2021-44964 fixed for 2.0 branch: #13450

Change Log
Does this affect the toolchain?

NO

Associated issues
  • #xxxx
Links to CVEs
Test Methodology
  • local build
Screenshot 2025-12-26 134344 Screenshot 2025-12-26 134508

@jykanase jykanase requested a review from a team as a code owner December 26, 2025 08:20
@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added Packaging 3.0-dev PRs Destined for AzureLinux 3.0 labels Dec 26, 2025
@Kanishk-Bansal Kanishk-Bansal requested a review from mfrw December 27, 2025 06:03
Copy link
Member

@mfrw mfrw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Triggered a test build:

NACK - I can see modification in the ldebug.c file, while as the referenced patch does not modify that file.

Copy link
Member

@mfrw mfrw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Patches apply cleanly

  • Patches look good w.r.t upstream

Signed-Off by: @mfrw

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

3.0-dev PRs Destined for AzureLinux 3.0 Packaging security

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants