Skip to content

Conversation

@SumitJenaHCL
Copy link
Contributor

@SumitJenaHCL SumitJenaHCL commented Nov 27, 2024

Merge Checklist

All boxes should be checked before merging the PR (just tick any boxes which don't apply to this PR)

  • The toolchain has been rebuilt successfully (or no changes were made to it)
  • The toolchain/worker package manifests are up-to-date
  • Any updated packages successfully build (or no packages were changed)
  • Packages depending on static components modified in this PR (Golang, *-static subpackages, etc.) have had their Release tag incremented.
  • Package tests (%check section) have been verified with RUN_CHECK=y for existing SPEC files, or added to new SPEC files
  • All package sources are available
  • cgmanifest files are up-to-date and sorted (./cgmanifest.json, ./toolkit/scripts/toolchain/cgmanifest.json, .github/workflows/cgmanifest.json)
  • LICENSE-MAP files are up-to-date (./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/data/licenses.json, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSES-MAP.md, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSE-EXCEPTIONS.PHOTON)
  • All source files have up-to-date hashes in the *.signatures.json files
  • sudo make go-tidy-all and sudo make go-test-coverage pass
  • Documentation has been updated to match any changes to the build system
  • Ready to merge

Summary

What does the PR accomplish, why was it needed?
The PR is to upgrade the package libreport version 2.17.15

Change Log
  • SPECS-EXTENDED/libreport/0001-gui-wizard-gtk-Fix-segfault.patch
  • SPECS-EXTENDED/libreport/libreport.signatures.json
  • SPECS-EXTENDED/libreport/libreport.spec
  • cgmanifest.json
Does this affect the toolchain?

NO

Associated issues
  • #xxxx
Links to CVEs
Test Methodology
  • Local Build

@SumitJenaHCL SumitJenaHCL requested review from a team as code owners November 27, 2024 08:30
@SumitJenaHCL SumitJenaHCL marked this pull request as draft January 2, 2025 10:49
@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added Packaging specs-extended PR to fix SPECS-EXTENDED 3.0-dev PRs Destined for AzureLinux 3.0 labels Feb 24, 2025
@SumitJenaHCL SumitJenaHCL marked this pull request as ready for review February 24, 2025 08:42
Copy link
Contributor

@kgodara912 kgodara912 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good for next stage: buddy build pipeline.

@sandeepkarambelkar
Copy link
Contributor

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

3.0-dev PRs Destined for AzureLinux 3.0 Packaging specs-extended PR to fix SPECS-EXTENDED

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants