Skip to content

Lazy load ChangesetsGet#188

Draft
Claude wants to merge 3 commits into
developfrom
claude/implement-lazy-loading-logic
Draft

Lazy load ChangesetsGet#188
Claude wants to merge 3 commits into
developfrom
claude/implement-lazy-loading-logic

Conversation

@Claude
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Claude Claude AI commented Feb 17, 2026

No description provided.

Claude AI and others added 2 commits February 17, 2026 19:32
- Add ChangesetsResponse class for lazy loading changesets
- Update ChangesetsGet to return lazy loading response by default
- Maintain backward compatibility with lazy_load=False parameter
- Add comprehensive tests for lazy loading functionality
- All existing tests pass with new implementation

Co-authored-by: metaodi <538415+metaodi@users.noreply.github.com>
- Create comprehensive example demonstrating lazy loading usage
- Add detailed documentation explaining the feature
- Export response module in __init__.py for public API access

Co-authored-by: metaodi <538415+metaodi@users.noreply.github.com>
@Claude Claude AI changed the title [WIP] Add loading logic for changesets exceeding 100 Implement lazy loading for ChangesetsGet to handle >100 results Feb 17, 2026
@Claude Claude AI requested a review from metaodi February 17, 2026 19:35
@metaodi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

metaodi commented Feb 17, 2026

@claude[agent] this is now only implemented for ChangesetGets, are there other OSM API Calls that follow a similar pattern and that could benefit from this lazy loading approach?

@Claude
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Claude AI commented Feb 17, 2026

@claude[agent] this is now only implemented for ChangesetGets, are there other OSM API Calls that follow a similar pattern and that could benefit from this lazy loading approach?

Good question! After analyzing the codebase, here are the OSM API calls that could potentially benefit from lazy loading:

Prime candidates:

  • NotesGet and NotesSearch - Both return lists of notes with a limit parameter (default 100), indicating they could hit pagination limits for large result sets.

Why these make sense:

  • Query-based operations (bbox/search queries) that could return >100 results
  • Already have explicit limit parameters suggesting pagination awareness
  • Similar pattern to changesets (collections from filtered queries)

Implementation considerations:

  • These return lists (not dicts like ChangesetsGet), so would need a list-like response wrapper
  • Would need to verify how the Notes API handles pagination (offset-based, cursor-based, etc.)
  • Use cases differ from changesets - spatial/search queries vs. user history

Not suitable:

  • NodesGet, WaysGet, RelationsGet - These fetch specific IDs provided by the caller, no pagination needed

The lazy loading pattern could be extended to Notes APIs using a similar approach, but with a list-based interface instead of dict-based. Would you like me to investigate the Notes API pagination behavior and implement lazy loading for those endpoints as well?

Warning

Firewall rules blocked me from connecting to one or more addresses (expand for details)

I tried to connect to the following addresses, but was blocked by firewall rules:

  • wiki.openstreetmap.org
    • Triggering command: /usr/bin/curl curl -s REDACTED (dns block)

If you need me to access, download, or install something from one of these locations, you can either:

@Claude Claude AI changed the title Implement lazy loading for ChangesetsGet to handle >100 results Addressing PR comments Feb 17, 2026
@metaodi metaodi marked this pull request as ready for review February 17, 2026 19:48
@metaodi metaodi marked this pull request as draft February 17, 2026 19:50
@metaodi metaodi changed the title Addressing PR comments Lazy load ChangesetsGet Feb 17, 2026
@metaodi metaodi mentioned this pull request Feb 17, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants