Skip to content

[X-2935] Bump arrow-datafusion rev to 641f176#48

Merged
zhuqi-lucas merged 1 commit into
branch-53from
qizhu/x-2935-bump-df-rev
Jun 12, 2026
Merged

[X-2935] Bump arrow-datafusion rev to 641f176#48
zhuqi-lucas merged 1 commit into
branch-53from
qizhu/x-2935-bump-df-rev

Conversation

@zhuqi-lucas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

Bump pinned arrow-datafusion rev from `bb55984b9` to `641f1767ed` to pick up the X-2935 PhysicalExtensionCodec breaking change (massive-com/arrow-datafusion#60).

Affects

  • MV: pure dependency bump. MV doesn't implement `PhysicalExtensionCodec` directly, so the trait signature change has no source impact here.
  • Wire format: unchanged.
  • Staging / prod blast radius: none until the atlas PR pins to this MV SHA.

Test

  • Remote CI build/test.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 12, 2026 08:39

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

Picks up the X-2935 PhysicalExtensionCodec breaking change
(massive-com/arrow-datafusion#60) on branch-53.

Wire format unchanged; trait signature change is the only API
impact. MV doesn't implement PhysicalExtensionCodec so this
bump is a pure dependency move.
@zhuqi-lucas zhuqi-lucas force-pushed the qizhu/x-2935-bump-df-rev branch from d92a7cf to b3b068d Compare June 12, 2026 08:42
@zhuqi-lucas zhuqi-lucas changed the title [X-2935] Bump arrow-datafusion rev to 641f1767ed [X-2935] Bump arrow-datafusion rev to 641f176 Jun 12, 2026
@zhuqi-lucas zhuqi-lucas merged commit 085b2cb into branch-53 Jun 12, 2026
8 checks passed
@zhuqi-lucas zhuqi-lucas deleted the qizhu/x-2935-bump-df-rev branch June 12, 2026 08:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants