Adding pandoc-secnos to the build environment.#466
Adding pandoc-secnos to the build environment.#466matthewturk wants to merge 2 commits intomanubot:mainfrom
Conversation
|
AppVeyor build 1.0.281 for commit e923638 is now complete. Found 51 potential spelling error(s). Preview:content/02.delete-me.md:44:adipiscingcontent/02.delete-me.md:44:aliqua content/02.delete-me.md:44:amet content/02.delete-me.md:44:consectetur content/02.delete-me.md:44:dolore content/02.delete-me.md:44:eiusmod content/02.delete-me.md:44:elit content/02.delete-me.md:44:incididunt content/02.delete-me.md:44:ipsum content/02.delete-me.md:44:labore content/02.delete-me.md:44:Lorem content/02.delete-me.md:44:magna content/02... |
agitter
left a comment
agitter
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This also looks reasonable to me. Thanks for updating the documentation.
It would make sense to merge manubot/manubot#334 first so we can update the manubot version in the environment here.
Yes, can upgrade manubot to manubot/manubot@fb39504 I'm in favor of adding pandoc-secnos if we think it's unlikely to break anything. For manuscripts without any Unfortunately, the pandoc-xnos suite hasn't been receiving frequent maintenance. So switching to pandoc-crossref is probably the right move for Manubot. However, the syntax is similar, so merging this should not interfere with switching. |
|
AppVeyor build 1.0.282 for commit 76924c1 is now complete. Found 51 potential spelling error(s). Preview:content/02.delete-me.md:44:adipiscingcontent/02.delete-me.md:44:aliqua content/02.delete-me.md:44:amet content/02.delete-me.md:44:consectetur content/02.delete-me.md:44:dolore content/02.delete-me.md:44:eiusmod content/02.delete-me.md:44:elit content/02.delete-me.md:44:incididunt content/02.delete-me.md:44:ipsum content/02.delete-me.md:44:labore content/02.delete-me.md:44:Lorem content/02.delete-me.md:44:magna content/02... |
4 participants
In conjunction with manubot/manubot#334 , this makes it possible to add section references to a manuscript. I have not updated the github hash for manubot referenced in the build environment, but will if/when that pull request is accepted.
A sample build of this is now in the yt paper build where you can see the number of sections referenced. I did note that all the sections are part of part 1, which I suspect might be an issue with the fact that I seem to be using
##as the base section number. That's probably fixable somehow on our end.