|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +title: Syntax |
| 3 | +date: 2025-06-02/03/04 |
| 4 | +--- |
| 5 | + |
| 6 | +# Syntax |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | +## Defining Syntax |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +"Colorless green ideas sleep furiously." - Chomsky, 1957 |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +### Knowledge of sentence structure |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +1. Difference between **grammatical** and **meaningful**. |
| 15 | +2. Cannot determine **grammaticality** by comparing new sentences and phrases to those we have seen before. |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +Some knowledge of rules that allow us to construct new sentences. |
| 18 | +**Syntax** is the study of those rules. |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +### What do syntaticians study? |
| 21 | +- How we combine words to form sentences |
| 22 | +- In other words, the **tacit knowledge** we have about how language is structured. |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +### Learning vs. Acquisition |
| 25 | +Children don't learn to speak languages the way they learn to tie their shoes or set the table. |
| 26 | +- Conscious Knowledge is learned |
| 27 | +- Unconscious knowledge is acquired. |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +Children must acquire certain individual properties of the language they are exposed to. |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +### Noam Chomsky and Universal Grammar |
| 32 | +- Language is an **instinct**. |
| 33 | +- While individual languages must be acquired, much of language is **innate**. |
| 34 | +- **Universal Grammar** (UG) |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +### Type of data Syntaticians use |
| 37 | +- Major source of data: **Grammaticality judgements**. Psychological experiment performed with a native speaker of the language you are studying. |
| 38 | +- Symbols |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | +| Meaning | Symbol | |
| 41 | +| :--------------------------------: | :----------: | |
| 42 | +| Ungrammatical | * | |
| 43 | +| Variablity | % | |
| 44 | +| Grammatical, nonsense semantically | # | |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +### Generative grammar |
| 47 | +- sentences generated by rules |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +### Hypothesis |
| 50 | +- Competence vs. Performance |
| 51 | + - Focused on Competence in syntax. |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | +## From words to word classes |
| 55 | +### Grammatical categories |
| 56 | +Aim to make generalization about how words combine to form sentences. |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | +### Identifying grammatical categories |
| 59 | +- Morphological tests |
| 60 | + - by affixes only attach to certain word classes |
| 61 | + - if passes, it must be a member of that category, but not vice versa. |
| 62 | +- Distributional evidence |
| 63 | + - By looking at the distributional evidence, we can therefore say something about the grammatical category. |
| 64 | + |
| 65 | +### Two main groups |
| 66 | +- **Lexical** categories denote concepts like objects, attributes, actions, and ideas |
| 67 | +- **Functional** categories specify grammatical relations |
| 68 | + |
| 69 | +## From words to phrases |
| 70 | +Hypothesis: |
| 71 | +1. A sentence is a collection of objects. |
| 72 | +2. A sentence is an *ordered* collection of words. |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | +### Constituents |
| 75 | +- Some word form units (constituents), while others not. |
| 76 | + |
| 77 | +#### Tests to identify constituents |
| 78 | +- Fragment/Stand alone test |
| 79 | + - Constituents can stand on their own in response to a question. |
| 80 | +- Replacement/substitution test |
| 81 | + - Some constituents can be replaced by other words, without radically changing the meaning. |
| 82 | +- Movement test |
| 83 | + - Some constituents can move as units. |
| 84 | +- Clefting/psuedo-clefting |
| 85 | + - Clefting: *It was ... that ...* |
| 86 | + - Psuedo-Clefting: *... is/are (what/where/who) ...* |
| 87 | +- Coordination |
| 88 | + - Two constituents of the same type can be coordinated using conjunction words like *and*, *or* and *but*. |
0 commit comments