docs(changelog): version 1.3.0 [citest_skip]

[richm]

Update changelog and .README.html for version 1.3.0

Signed-off-by: Rich Megginson rmeggins@redhat.com

Summary by Sourcery

Documentation:

• Add 1.3.0 entry to the changelog describing new features and CI/test updates.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide

Updates CHANGELOG.md to document the 1.3.0 release, including one new feature and several CI/testing-related maintenance updates.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Document the 1.3.0 release in the changelog, including new feature and CI/testing updates.	Add a new 1.3.0 release section with date and headings for New Features and Other Changes List the new feature for adding role fingerprints to syslog with reference to its PR Summarize multiple CI, ansible-lint, tox-lsr, Fedora CI matrix, and testing-related updates under Other Changes	CHANGELOG.md

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey - I've found 1 issue

Prompt for AI Agents

Please address the comments from this code review:

## Individual Comments

### Comment 1
<location path="CHANGELOG.md" line_range="22" />
<code_context>
+- ci: bump actions/upload-artifact from 6 to 7 (#116)
+- ci: tox-lsr 3.17.0 - container test improvements, use ansible 2.20 for fedora 43 [citest_skip] (#118)
+- ci: tox-lsr 3.17.1 - previous update broke container tests, this fixes them [citest_skip] (#119)
+- test: ensure role gathers the facts it uses by having test clear_facts before include_role (#120)
+- ci: fix yum repos to use devel site instead of old site name [citest_skip] (#121)
+- ci: update header for run_role_with_clear_facts [citest_skip] (#122)
</code_context>
<issue_to_address>
**suggestion (typo):** Consider adding an article in "having test clear_facts" for grammatical clarity.

The wording is a bit awkward. Please rephrase to something like “having the test clear_facts” or “having tests clear_facts” to improve readability.

```suggestion
- test: ensure role gathers the facts it uses by having the test clear_facts before include_role (#120)
```
</issue_to_address>

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[sourcery-ai]

suggestion (typo): Consider adding an article in "having test clear_facts" for grammatical clarity.

The wording is a bit awkward. Please rephrase to something like “having the test clear_facts” or “having tests clear_facts” to improve readability.

Suggested change

	- test: ensure role gathers the facts it uses by having test clear_facts before include_role (#120)
	- test: ensure role gathers the facts it uses by having the test clear_facts before include_role (#120)