Skip to content

Update intro copy for clarity#48

Merged
reednaa merged 3 commits intomainfrom
feature/copy-changes
May 6, 2026
Merged

Update intro copy for clarity#48
reednaa merged 3 commits intomainfrom
feature/copy-changes

Conversation

@jimmchang
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jimmchang jimmchang commented May 5, 2026

Summary

Very small copy changes based on feedback to reduce confusion. No functional changes.

  • Introduction panel (src/lib/components/Introduction.svelte): reframes the intro to describe the app as a work-in-progress chain-abstracted flow built on the Open Intents Framework, supporting a Resource Lock flow via The Compact and an ERC 7683-compliant escrow flow. Existing hyperlinks (Open Intents Framework, The Compact) are preserved.
  • Main page heading (src/routes/+page.svelte): Resource lock intents using OIFIntents with Open Intents Framework.

Test plan

  • Run dev server and verify the main page heading reads "Intents with Open Intents Framework"
  • Verify the Introduction panel renders the updated copy
  • Confirm both hyperlinks (Open Intents Framework, The Compact) open the expected destinations

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@jimmchang jimmchang requested a review from reednaa as a code owner May 5, 2026 01:37
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented May 5, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@jimmchang has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 56 minutes and 18 seconds before requesting another review.

To keep reviews running without waiting, you can enable usage-based add-on for your organization. This allows additional reviews beyond the hourly cap. Account admins can enable it under billing.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: c22c3508-6d63-448d-b406-049f34080e69

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 822f995 and c6546dd.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/lib/components/Introduction.svelte
  • src/routes/+page.svelte
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The introductory text in the Introduction component was rewritten to describe the app's chain-abstracted flow with updated terminology, and the Multichain section was repositioned from early in the component to after the Same Chain section. Minor <br /> visual separators were adjusted.

Changes

Content Reorganization

Layer / File(s) Summary
Introductory Text Rewrite
src/lib/components/Introduction.svelte (lines 1-11)
Opening paragraph reworded to describe the "chain-abstracted flow," clarify supported Resource Lock/escrow flows, and update terminology (e.g., "webapp" → "web app", "support" → "supports").
Section Reordering
src/lib/components/Introduction.svelte (lines 12-31, 73-84)
"Multichain" heading and explanatory paragraph moved from early position in component to after the "Same Chain" section later in the document.
Visual Formatting
src/lib/components/Introduction.svelte (lines 32-54)
<br /> separators added/adjusted as visual boundaries between "Why Resource Locks?", "Why the Open Intents Framework?", and other sections.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

🐰 A rabbit hops through prose rearranged,
Words flow better, order changed,
Chains abstractly now explained,
With clarity refreshingly maintained!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'Update intro copy for clarity' directly aligns with the pull request's primary objective of rewriting the introductory text for improved clarity and reducing confusion.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch feature/copy-changes

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@jimmchang jimmchang requested review from Asem-Abdelhady and removed request for reednaa May 5, 2026 01:39
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented May 5, 2026

🚀 Preview deployed!

Worker: lintent-pr-48
URL: https://lintent-pr-48.li-fi374.workers.dev

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@src/lib/components/Introduction.svelte`:
- Line 11: The phrase "and a ERC 7683-compliant escrow flow." uses the wrong
indefinite article; change "a" to "an" so it reads "and an ERC 7683-compliant
escrow flow." Locate the string "and a ERC 7683-compliant escrow flow." in the
Introduction component (the rendered copy in Introduction.svelte) and update the
article only, preserving punctuation and spacing.
- Line 80: In the Introduction.svelte component update the sentence fragment
that reads "Multichain intents are currently work in progress and will break in
the future." to use the correct article: change "work in progress" to "a work in
progress" so it reads "Multichain intents are currently a work in progress and
will break in the future."
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 482ccc77-9be4-4498-8ce1-4fa2a607c1af

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a40bf57 and 822f995.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/lib/components/Introduction.svelte

Comment thread src/lib/components/Introduction.svelte Outdated
Comment thread src/lib/components/Introduction.svelte Outdated
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented May 5, 2026

🚀 Preview deployed!

Worker: lintent-pr-48
URL: https://lintent-pr-48.li-fi374.workers.dev

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented May 5, 2026

🚀 Preview deployed!

Worker: lintent-pr-48
URL: https://lintent-pr-48.li-fi374.workers.dev

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@Asem-Abdelhady Asem-Abdelhady left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good

@reednaa reednaa merged commit 3f10d1b into main May 6, 2026
7 checks passed
@reednaa reednaa deleted the feature/copy-changes branch May 6, 2026 13:16
@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot mentioned this pull request May 6, 2026
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants