Feat: SRV3 + CMv2 + CSMv3 proposed contracts and vote changes

[tamtamchik]

Please, go through these steps before you request a review:

📝 Describe your changes

1. New contracts for SRv3 deployment
2. New contracts for CSMv3 deployment
3. New contracts for CMv2 deployment
4. New contracts for EasyTrack factories
5. Upgrade contracts (vote)

🔎 Attach a source of truth or evidence that allows reviewers to confirm the changes independently

1. feat: srv3 deployment core#1900
2. CM v2 deployment artifacts on mainnet staking-modules#849
3. Upgrade mainnet CSM staking-modules#842
4. chore: CSMv3 and CMv2 factories deploy easy-track#125
5. feat: srv3 deployment core#1912

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Adds proposed SRv3-related contract addresses to the mainnet “Deployed contracts” documentation, referencing the core repo PR as the source of truth.

Changes:

• Added multiple \[proposed] contract addresses (implementations and new components) under Core Protocol.
• Added \[proposed] entries under Oracle Contracts for AccountingOracle and ValidatorsExitBusOracle.
• Extended the list with additional SRv3 components (e.g., gateways, consolidation contracts, temporary admin).

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.

[krogla]

lgtm

[krogla]

lgtm

[TheDZhon]

👀

[TheDZhon]

❤️

[lemonjelly27]

Review scope so far (hoodi.md only — index.md to follow):

✅ Link-text/URL pairs checked, no mismatches.
⏳ The entries flagged inline don't appear in any hoodi proposal calldata

Could you attach deployment proof for these?

[mkurayan]

@lemonjelly27, regarding contacts addresses review you can additionally use JSON files with all artefacts.

For core repo addresses:
hoodi: https://github.com/lidofinance/core/blob/develop/deployed-hoodi.json
mainnet: https://github.com/lidofinance/core/blob/develop/deployed-mainnet.json

Cheers! 🙌

[lemonjelly27]

Mainnet (index.md) review complete.

✅ All link-text/URL pairs on added lines checked - no mismatches.
✅ All new contract addresses verified against the attached source-of-truth PRs. No discrepancies found.

⏳ One gap: I could not find these three addresses in any of the four attached PRs:

• Upgrade Config: 0xf94e7A95C559728AcA33bFa7136Ea5De40B0338E
• Upgrade Template: 0xD92b6303Ba39297Cb69a3a17A88b47586A6af14C
• Upgrade Vote Script: 0xE6530830A2cf90773cB232748b2c674c27b6E0CA

Could you add the source that covers them to the PR description?

Cosmetic, non-blocking: three addresses are lowercase rather than checksummed. Suggesting normalizing for consistency with the rest of the page.

[lemonjelly27]

Approving the PR. Thanks everyone for the quick follow-ups and for helping close the verification gaps so promptly.