Display facets with a parent-child relationship as a tree#1214
Open
lrosenstrom wants to merge 2 commits intodevelopfrom
Open
Display facets with a parent-child relationship as a tree#1214lrosenstrom wants to merge 2 commits intodevelopfrom
lrosenstrom wants to merge 2 commits intodevelopfrom
Conversation
lrosenstrom
requested review from
jesperengstrom,
johanbissemattsson and
olovy
lrosenstrom
force-pushed
the
feature/LWS-268-facet-tree
branch
from
0f40bb8 to
1e30c70
Compare
lrosenstrom
force-pushed
the
feature/LWS-268-facet-tree
branch
from
1e30c70 to
91e66b5
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
First take on displaying facets in a hierarchy/tree. Depends on LWS-268.
Solves
Sort facets in a tree based on the subClassOf property. Adaptions have to be made to both the frontend part and backend part when it is more clear how the type normalization will turn out. Probably we will want to facet on combined types under contentType. The work-type hierarchy will change / be removed.
TODO: