Embedded Safety version of simpletest #3
+112
−256
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…iler V6.16 and V6.6.4 using ARM FuSa library
…beddedSafety version of simpletest
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Modified simpletest so that it would build successfully with ARM compiler V6.16 and V6.6.4 using ARM FuSa (Functional Safety) library. This is perfect for critical safety systems that have functional safety requirements.
Technically, this should build successfully with other embedded software cross-compilers and work seamlessly on the target hardware.
Some features of the original simpletest have been removed (such as threading) due to causing errors during the build. Therefore, I don't think this pull request should merge to master but rather to a dedicated branch of EmbeddedSafety in the simplest repository.