Skip to content

Comments

Integrate kontext-dev SDK#1

Closed
michiosw wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
kontext-dev
Closed

Integrate kontext-dev SDK#1
michiosw wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
kontext-dev

Conversation

@michiosw
Copy link

Summary

  • integrate kontext-dev SDK for single MCP gateway (SEARCH/EXECUTE)
  • wire config + token handling for the gateway
  • document config and examples
  • stabilize tests and locale-sensitive formatting

Testing

  • just fmt
  • just fix -p codex-core
  • just fix -p codex-exec-server
  • just fix -p codex-protocol
  • cargo test -p codex-core
  • cargo test -p codex-exec-server
  • cargo test -p codex-protocol
  • cargo test --all-features

michiosw pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2026
…ai#8950)

Agent wouldn't "see" attached images and would instead try to use the
view_file tool:
<img width="1516" height="504" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/68a705bb-f962-4fc1-9087-e932a6859b12"
/>

In this PR, we wrap image content items in XML tags with the name of
each image (now just a numbered name like `[Image #1]`), so that the
model can understand inline image references (based on name). We also
put the image content items above the user message which the model seems
to prefer (maybe it's more used to definitions being before references).

We also tweak the view_file tool description which seemed to help a bit

Results on a simple eval set of images:

Before
<img width="980" height="310" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ba838651-2565-4684-a12e-81a36641bf86"
/>

After
<img width="918" height="322" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/10a81951-7ee6-415e-a27e-e7a3fd0aee6f"
/>

```json
[
  {
    "id": "single_describe",
    "prompt": "Describe the attached image in one sentence.",
    "images": ["image_a.png"]
  },
  {
    "id": "single_color",
    "prompt": "What is the dominant color in the image? Answer with a single color word.",
    "images": ["image_b.png"]
  },
  {
    "id": "orientation_check",
    "prompt": "Is the image portrait or landscape? Answer in one sentence.",
    "images": ["image_c.png"]
  },
  {
    "id": "detail_request",
    "prompt": "Look closely at the image and call out any small details you notice.",
    "images": ["image_d.png"]
  },
  {
    "id": "two_images_compare",
    "prompt": "I attached two images. Are they the same or different? Briefly explain.",
    "images": ["image_a.png", "image_b.png"]
  },
  {
    "id": "two_images_captions",
    "prompt": "Provide a short caption for each image (Image 1, Image 2).",
    "images": ["image_c.png", "image_d.png"]
  },
  {
    "id": "multi_image_rank",
    "prompt": "Rank the attached images from most colorful to least colorful.",
    "images": ["image_a.png", "image_b.png", "image_c.png"]
  },
  {
    "id": "multi_image_choice",
    "prompt": "Which image looks more vibrant? Answer with 'Image 1' or 'Image 2'.",
    "images": ["image_b.png", "image_d.png"]
  }
]
```
michiosw pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2026
I've seen this test fail with:

```
 - Mock #1.
        	Expected range of matching incoming requests: == 2
        	Number of matched incoming requests: 1
```

This is because we pop the wrong task_complete events and then the test
exits. I think this is because the MCP events are now buffered after
openai#8874.

So:
1. clear the buffer before we do any user message sending
2. additionally listen for task start before task complete
3. use the ID from task start to find the correct task complete event.
@michiosw michiosw closed this Feb 7, 2026
tumberger pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2026
Fixes openai#9050

When a draft is stashed with Ctrl+C, we now persist the full draft state
(text elements, local image paths, and pending paste payloads) in local
history. Up/Down recall rehydrates placeholder elements and attachments
so styling remains correct and large pastes still expand on submit.
Persistent (cross‑session) history remains text‑only.

Backtrack prefills now reuse the selected user message’s text elements
and local image paths, so image placeholders/attachments rehydrate when
rolling back.

External editor replacements keep only attachments whose placeholders
remain and then normalize image placeholders to `[Image #1]..[Image #N]`
to keep the attachment mapping consistent.

Docs:
- docs/tui-chat-composer.md

Testing:
- just fix -p codex-tui
- cargo test -p codex-tui

Co-authored-by: Eric Traut <etraut@openai.com>
tumberger pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2026
…i#10590)

## Summary
This PR makes app-server-provided image URLs first-class attachments in
TUI, so they survive resume/backtrack/history recall and are resubmitted
correctly.

<img width="715" height="491" alt="Screenshot 2026-02-12 at 8 27 08 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/226cbd35-8f0c-4e51-a13e-459ef5dd1927"
/>

Can delete the attached image upon backtracking:
<img width="716" height="301" alt="Screenshot 2026-02-12 at 8 27 31 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4558d230-f1bd-4eed-a093-8e1ab9c6db27"
/>

In both history and composer, remote images are rendered as normal
`[Image #N]` placeholders, with numbering unified with local images.

## What changed
- Plumb remote image URLs through TUI message state:
  - `UserHistoryCell`
  - `BacktrackSelection`
  - `ChatComposerHistory::HistoryEntry`
  - `ChatWidget::UserMessage`
- Show remote images as placeholder rows inside the composer box (above
textarea), and in history cells.
- Support keyboard selection/deletion for remote image rows in composer
(`Up`/`Down`, `Delete`/`Backspace`).
- Preserve remote-image-only turns in local composer history (Up/Down
recall), including restore after backtrack.
- Ensure submit/queue/backtrack resubmit include remote images in model
input (`UserInput::Image`), and keep request shape stable for
remote-image-only turns.
- Keep image numbering contiguous across remote + local images:
  - remote images occupy `[Image #1]..[Image #M]`
  - local images start at `[Image #M+1]`
  - deletion renumbers consistently.
- In protocol conversion, increment shared image index for remote images
too, so mixed remote/local image tags stay in a single sequence.
- Simplify restore logic to trust in-memory attachment order (no
placeholder-number parsing path).
- Backtrack/replay rollback handling now queues trims through
`AppEvent::ApplyThreadRollback` and syncs transcript overlay/deferred
lines after trims, so overlay/transcript state stays consistent.
- Trim trailing blank rendered lines from user history rendering to
avoid oversized blank padding.

## Docs + tests
- Updated: `docs/tui-chat-composer.md` (remote image flow,
selection/deletion, numbering offsets)
- Added/updated tests across `tui/src/chatwidget/tests.rs`,
`tui/src/app.rs`, `tui/src/app_backtrack.rs`, `tui/src/history_cell.rs`,
and `tui/src/bottom_pane/chat_composer.rs`
- Added snapshot coverage for remote image composer states, including
deleting the first of two remote images.

## Validation
- `just fmt`
- `cargo test -p codex-tui`

## Codex author
`codex fork 019c2636-1571-74a1-8471-15a3b1c3f49d`
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant