feat: Add field handling to support both mt-fields and mt-records embedded fieldnames #6
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Updated data handling to support flexible field definition in HTML templates. Initially, fields were expected within the
mt-fieldstag:Now, added support for embedding fieldnames at the top of data within
mt-records:This update handles both scenarios: using
mt-fieldsfor fieldnames ifmt-fieldsattribute is present and detecting embedded fieldnames inmt-recordsifmt-fieldsattribute is absent.Refactored code to use let and const for scoped variables to improve code reliability by explicitly defining variable scopes, reducing the risk of unintended redeclarations, side effects and conflicts.
Minor styling changes