Skip to content

Update coverage to 5.0.1#190

Closed
pyup-bot wants to merge 2 commits intomasterfrom
pyup-update-coverage-5.0-to-5.0.1
Closed

Update coverage to 5.0.1#190
pyup-bot wants to merge 2 commits intomasterfrom
pyup-update-coverage-5.0-to-5.0.1

Conversation

@pyup-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR updates coverage from 5.0 to 5.0.1.

Changelog

5.0.1

----------------------------

- If a 4.x data file is the cause of a "file is not a database" error, then use
a more specific error message, "Looks like a coverage 4.x data file, are you
mixing versions of coverage?"  Helps diagnose the problems described in
`issue 886`_.

- Measurement contexts and relative file names didn't work together, as
reported in `issue 899`_ and `issue 900`_.  This is now fixed, thanks to
David Szotten.

- When using ``coverage run --concurrency=multiprocessing``, all data files
should be named with parallel-ready suffixes.  5.0 mistakenly named the main
process' file with no suffix when using ``--append``.  This is now fixed,
closing `issue 880`_.

- Fixed a problem on Windows when the current directory is changed to a
different drive (`issue 895`_).  Thanks, Olivier Grisel.

- Updated Python 3.9 support to 3.9a2.

.. _issue 880: https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/880
.. _issue 886: https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/886
.. _issue 895: https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/895
.. _issue 899: https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/899
.. _issue 900: https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/900


.. _changes_50:
Links

@pyup-bot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

pyup-bot commented Jan 7, 2020

Closing this in favor of #194

@pyup-bot pyup-bot closed this Jan 7, 2020
@joaogarciadelima joaogarciadelima deleted the pyup-update-coverage-5.0-to-5.0.1 branch January 7, 2020 05:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

Comments