Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @jaredwray, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly enhances the project's documentation by adding a detailed section on HTTPS support. It covers various methods for enabling HTTPS, from simple auto-generation to using custom certificates and standalone certificate generation utilities, providing users with clear guidance on securing their mock HTTP servers. Highlights
Changelog
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 3f0ba83b1c
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request adds documentation for the new HTTPS support feature. The documentation is comprehensive and covers various use cases. I've found a few areas in the README.md examples and reference tables that could be improved for clarity and correctness. My suggestions focus on fixing an invalid code example, ensuring examples are complete, and correcting the format in a reference table.
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #125 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 37 37
Lines 1044 1044
Branches 208 208
=========================================
Hits 1044 1044 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
feat: adding in https support in docs