chore: getting test coverage back to normal levels#124
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @jaredwray, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request focuses on improving the test coverage and robustness of the certificate generation module. By exposing and thoroughly testing key internal utility functions related to integer encoding and IPv6 address expansion, the changes ensure that these critical components behave as expected under various conditions, contributing to a more reliable certificate generation process. Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #124 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 99.52% 100.00% +0.47%
===========================================
Files 37 37
Lines 1042 1044 +2
Branches 208 208
===========================================
+ Hits 1037 1044 +7
+ Misses 5 0 -5 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request successfully increases test coverage by exporting and testing two internal functions, encodeInteger and expandIpv6. The new tests are well-written and cover important cases. I've added a couple of suggestions to make the test suite for expandIpv6 more comprehensive and to address a potentially brittle assertion in one of the new tests that relies on a specific output format from Node.js's crypto module.
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
chore: getting test coverage back to normal levels