feat: adding mock certificate support for ssl testing#122
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @jaredwray, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces robust support for HTTPS within the Highlights
Changelog
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 78fdb3fd45
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces support for generating mock SSL certificates for testing purposes, enabling the mock server to run over HTTPS. The implementation for certificate generation is comprehensive but contains a critical bug in date encoding that could lead to invalid certificates for future dates. The integration into the MockHttp class is well-done, though there are some opportunities to improve code clarity and reduce duplication. I've provided comments to address the critical bug and suggest other improvements.
| } else if (options.https === false) { | ||
| this._https = undefined; | ||
| } else { | ||
| this._https = options.https; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This logic for handling the https option is duplicated in the https setter (lines 339-347). You can avoid this repetition and simplify the constructor by calling the setter directly.
if (options?.https !== undefined) {
this.https = options.https;
}| https: { | ||
| key: this._httpsCredentials.key, | ||
| cert: this._httpsCredentials.cert, | ||
| }, | ||
| } as Record<string, unknown>) as unknown as FastifyInstance; | ||
| } else { | ||
| this._server = Fastify(getFastifyConfig(this._logging)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The type assertion as Record<string, unknown>) as unknown as FastifyInstance suggests a potential typing issue and makes the code harder to read and less type-safe. It would be best to resolve the underlying type mismatch so the cast is not needed. The Fastify factory function should accept an options object with both logger and https properties. This might be solvable by ensuring getFastifyConfig returns a type compatible with FastifyOptions.
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #122 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 100.00% 99.51% -0.49%
===========================================
Files 36 37 +1
Lines 850 1040 +190
Branches 173 207 +34
===========================================
+ Hits 850 1035 +185
- Misses 0 5 +5 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
jaredwray
deleted the
feat-adding-mock-certificate-support-for-ssl-testing
branch
1 participant
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
feat: adding mock certificate support for ssl testing