fix: align UX flags with published modules

[ootakazuhiko]

Summary

Align UX metadata with the actual reader-facing modules audited for portfolio Sprint itdojp/it-engineer-knowledge-architecture#226.

• conceptMap: true → false; the chapter-1 learning-roadmap figure is not an independent concept-map module
• glossary: true → false; no dedicated glossary page or navigation exists
• retain quickStart / readingGuide / legalNotice because the public top exposes the 15-minute task routes, reading guide, and license section
• track the missing Profile A glossary in portal fix: align UX flags with published modules #227; concept map remains a recommended-module improvement

Verification

• npm ci
• npm test
• npm run docs:quality-gate
• npm run build
• npm audit --audit-level=moderate (0 vulnerabilities)
• git diff --check

Existing Ruby/Sass build warnings are tracked separately in #225.

Closes #226

[ootakazuhiko]

@codex review

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Aligns book-config.json UX module flags with what’s actually exposed to readers, based on the audit in itdojp/it-engineer-knowledge-architecture#226.

Changes:

• Set ux.modules.conceptMap from true to false.
• Set ux.modules.glossary from true to false.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Hooray!

Reviewed commit: adf8619812

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".