Skip to content

Migrate old "Fabric3" -> "fabric" version 3.2 #296

Open
brainexe wants to merge 6 commits intomasterfrom
fabric
Open

Migrate old "Fabric3" -> "fabric" version 3.2 #296
brainexe wants to merge 6 commits intomasterfrom
fabric

Conversation

@brainexe
Copy link
Member

Our current Fabric3 is quite outdated and causing more and more compatibility issues (like python3.13)
-> use the maintained "fabric" version

already tested: basic VM start/stop/build/delete/sync/info/restart/disk-set/mem-set
todo: migration (offline + online) / AWS / rename / vcpu-set

.format(tempfile, remote_path, mode)
)
conn = self._get_connection()
tempfile = '/tmp/' + str(uuid4())
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is mktemp in Python, maybe it could be used here.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in this case we create the /tmp/ on the target host. with mktemp we can only to it locally. I keep it as it is to keep changes (kinda) low

@brainexe brainexe force-pushed the fabric branch 2 times, most recently from 89b439e to 660f8e1 Compare February 13, 2026 07:38
@brainexe brainexe changed the title DRAFT: Migrate old "Fabric3" -> "fabric" version 3.2 Migrate old "Fabric3" -> "fabric" version 3.2 Feb 24, 2026
@brainexe brainexe requested a review from lamaral February 24, 2026 08:39
@brainexe brainexe force-pushed the fabric branch 2 times, most recently from 13bb332 to fc1e10b Compare February 26, 2026 05:57
Copy link
Contributor

@lamaral lamaral left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did some limited testing and couldn't break it, so LGTM.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants