Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we leave the " vs ' alone?
I have generally followed convention of using ' for "programmer" values and " for "user-facing" values (e.g. messages)
There are also some bits of formatting I'm not particularly impressed with where it breaks some lines across multiple lines in a way which makes them more difficult to read (particularly list comprehensions)
Also worth mentioning that this does cause a lot of noise in git blame which generally provides more value than some of the less valuable lint changes
f8ce19d to
4792c48
Compare
|
Looks a lot better with this config 👍 thanks |
5dbfdb6 to
913a94a
Compare
|
@ca-johnson this is now just the python I'm comfortable with that set now becoming incremental-linting fixes, though before doing that I'd extend the readme to explain the workflow. WDYT? |
6663658 to
7254592
Compare
Changes
The automatic fixes applied via
pre-commit run --all-files, stacked on #194.I don't think I'd land this in one go, particularly; this is more illustrative. I also probably would choose to not land this until after CI runs pre-commit for incremental linting.
Verification