Skip to content

ihalhashem/Antenna-Designs

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

53 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Antenna Designs

Introduction

Curated, simulation-first antenna library focused on space and defense sectors. Completed: dipole, microstrip patch. In progress: horn-fed offset parabolic reflector, conformal patch on cylinder, and a 4-element CRPA array. Each design includes HFSS models, parametric sweeps, S11 and 3D pattern plots, benchmarked against typical vendor data-sheet figures.

Table of Contents

Dipole Antenna

Overview

The typical starting geometry for antenna designs is the half-wave dipole antenna, so I will start with it, but optimise it to match a commercial half-wave dipole antenna from Southwest Antennas Inc. link.
Following is the geometry and the benchmark specifications:

Design Process

Starting with the theoretical formulas, I draw the geometry, then assign a lumped port excitation with 50 Ω impedance, create an open region with a PML boundary and an appropriate solution setup centred at 2.35 GHz. Following is the resultant S-parameter:

It is clear that the designed antenna doesn't meet the frequency requirements, so Optimetrics was used to optimise the geometry, and here is an example for the optimisation process where I sweep values for the arm-length multiplier:

Optimised Solution Results

I used the S11 metric for determining the bandwidth, and used −10 dB as the limit. This is conservative as it gives 1.925 VSWR, so better than the 2 figure in the benchmark. After optimisation, here are the resultant S11 and VSWR plots:

Gain (dBi):

Azimuth Pattern:

Elevation Pattern and Beamwidth:

Comparison with the Benchmark

Metric Southwest Antennas #1001-139 (datasheet) My HFSS Dipole
Frequency range @ VSWR ≤ 2 : 1 (GHz) 2.20 – 2.50 2.19 – 2.52
Maximum realised gain (dBi) 2.15 2.22
Horizontal AZ beamwidth (°) 360 360
Vertical EL beamwidth (°) 78 79

Patch Antenna

Overview

After the dipole, the next canonical single element is the microstrip patch. Here I design a probe-fed 2.4 GHz patch on RO4003C, optimised to the published specs of Cisco’s 6 dBi panel antenna (link). Below are the HFSS geometry and the vendor benchmark sheet:

Design Process

  • First-cut dimensions from closed-form patch formulas (W ≈ 41 mm, L ≈ 31 mm, h = 3.2 mm on RO4003C).
  • RG-316 probe feed: inner pin Ø 0.51 mm, PTFE sleeve Ø 1.70 mm.
  • Solution setup centred at 2.44 GHz with a PML open region.

Initial VSWR:

Optimetrics sweeps (probe offset & patch length/width) as below were done:

Optimised Solution Results

Using VSWR ≤ 2 as the bandwidth criterion, the optimisation process converged to this:

Gain (dBi)

Patterns and Beamwidth

(blue = E-plane, red = H-plane)

Comparison with the Benchmark

Metric Cisco AIR-ANT2460P-R (datasheet) My HFSS Patch
Frequency range @ VSWR ≤ 2 : 1 (GHz) 2.400 – 2.484 2.399 – 2.485
Maximum realised gain (dBi)* 6.0 7.35
E-Plane 3 dB beam-width (°) 69 76.8
H-Plane 3 dB beam-width (°) 75 79.5

* Datasheet includes the 0.9 m AA-9303 pigtail, RP-TNC connector and radome; those add ≈ 1.3 dB loss and broaden the lobes by ≈ +8° (E) / +4° (H).

About

Antenna designs for space/defense: dipole, patch, horn-fed offset reflector, conformal patch, 4-el CRPA.

Topics

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

 
 
 

Contributors