Codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints by hugocool · Pull Request #106 · hugocool/FateForger

hugocool · 2026-03-08T22:28:07Z

Update .github/ chat modes (architect, ask, code, debug) to AGENTS.md-first pattern; remove MemoriPilot references
Update copilot-instructions.md: AGENTS.md-first directive + working-mode hints
Update blog post: add memory-bank-goes-stale argument + In-Context Learning subtitle
Fix defaults_memory.py: add "graphiti" to _TASK_DEFAULTS_BACKENDS
Fix preferences.py: remove dead delete-based prune_shared_constraints; restore archive-based (issue/81) as the single canonical impl
Fix agent.py: use duplicates_archived key consistent with archive impl
Fix test_planning_reminder_suppression: use date.today() not hardcoded 2026-03-07
Fix test_task_defaults_memory: migrate mem0 build test to graphiti path
Fix test_timeboxing_constraint_store_canonicalization: direct DB inserts for dirty-state setup; assertions aligned to archive API
Add test_review_commit_template_includes_submit_button_guidance (merged from stash)
Update .env: TIMEBOXING_MEMORY_BACKEND=graphiti

Linked issue

GitHub issue:
Issue branch:

Acceptance criteria

Criterion 1:
Criterion 2:
Criterion 3:

Notebook -> artifact mapping (required for notebook-driven work)

Primary notebook path:
Notebook lifecycle status (WIP / Extraction complete / DONE / Reference / Archived):
Extracted implementation files (src/...):
Extracted test files (tests/...):
Extracted docs (README.md / docs/...):
Intentionally retained notebook-only content (and why):

Verification performed

Start-of-work cleanliness check recorded (git status --porcelain)
Pre-PR-close cleanliness check recorded (git status --porcelain)
Relevant automated tests passed
Notebook checkpoint passed (clean-kernel rerun or CI notebook check)

Commands run:

# paste commands used for verification

System-of-record sync

Issue status updated
PR description reflects current implementation status
Temporary /tickets/ markdown removed or explicitly retained as durable documentation

- Update .github/ chat modes (architect, ask, code, debug) to AGENTS.md-first pattern; remove MemoriPilot references - Update copilot-instructions.md: AGENTS.md-first directive + working-mode hints - Update blog post: add memory-bank-goes-stale argument + In-Context Learning subtitle - Fix defaults_memory.py: add "graphiti" to _TASK_DEFAULTS_BACKENDS - Fix preferences.py: remove dead delete-based prune_shared_constraints; restore archive-based (issue/81) as the single canonical impl - Fix agent.py: use duplicates_archived key consistent with archive impl - Fix test_planning_reminder_suppression: use date.today() not hardcoded 2026-03-07 - Fix test_task_defaults_memory: migrate mem0 build test to graphiti path - Fix test_timeboxing_constraint_store_canonicalization: direct DB inserts for dirty-state setup; assertions aligned to archive API - Add test_review_commit_template_includes_submit_button_guidance (merged from stash) - Update .env: TIMEBOXING_MEMORY_BACKEND=graphiti ## Linked issue - GitHub issue:  - Issue branch:  ## Acceptance criteria - [ ] Criterion 1: - [ ] Criterion 2: - [ ] Criterion 3: ## Notebook -> artifact mapping (required for notebook-driven work) - Primary notebook path: - Notebook lifecycle status (`WIP` / `Extraction complete` / `DONE` / `Reference` / `Archived`): - Extracted implementation files (`src/...`): - Extracted test files (`tests/...`): - Extracted docs (`README.md` / `docs/...`): - Intentionally retained notebook-only content (and why): ## Verification performed - [ ] Start-of-work cleanliness check recorded (`git status --porcelain`) - [ ] Pre-PR-close cleanliness check recorded (`git status --porcelain`) - [ ] Relevant automated tests passed - [ ] Notebook checkpoint passed (clean-kernel rerun or CI notebook check) Commands run: ```bash # paste commands used for verification ``` ## System-of-record sync - [ ] Issue status updated - [ ] PR description reflects current implementation status - [ ] Temporary `/tickets/` markdown removed or explicitly retained as durable documentation

hugolytics · 2026-03-08T22:41:59Z

Merge Handoff

This PR is the closure vehicle for issue #91, but only after PR #105 lands.

Acceptance Criteria status

Session override beats conflicting default/profile memory
Conditional default suppression works for same-day blockers
Non-conflict path keeps the default eligible
Debug snapshot exposes suppression evidence
Regression tests added and passing

Validation run

poetry run pytest tests/unit/test_timeboxing_constraint_selection.py -q
poetry run pytest tests/unit/test_timeboxing_constraint_selection.py tests/unit/test_timeboxing_durable_constraints.py tests/unit/test_constraint_retriever.py tests/unit/test_timeboxing_memory_backend_selection.py -q

No-code-loss instructions

Do not merge this stacked PR into issue/96-calendar-sync-idempotency and call the job done; the final landing path must be main through PRs.
After PR issue/96+81: calendar sync idempotency + graphiti memory backend #105 merges, retarget or rebase this PR onto main.
Compare the diff before and after retarget/rebase to ensure the #91 selection fix remains present.
Re-run the targeted tests after the base update before merging.
Close issue #91 only after this PR is merged to main and the close comment references the merged PR plus test evidence.

Open Items

To decide: whether to keep the plan docs in this PR
To do: rebase/retarget after PR issue/96+81: calendar sync idempotency + graphiti memory backend #105, rerun tests, merge, close #91
Blocked by: PR issue/96+81: calendar sync idempotency + graphiti memory backend #105 not merged yet

hugolytics · 2026-03-08T22:45:20Z

Substantial checkpoint

Current status

Option-3 code and tests are in place on this branch.
Fresh targeted validation re-run is green (42 passed).
Not merge-ready yet for issue closure because AC2/AC3 for Timeboxing regression: explicit in-thread constraints do not override conflicting defaults #91 remain open.

Branch

codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints

Dependency / merge order

This PR is stacked on issue/96+81: calendar sync idempotency + graphiti memory backend #105 (base=issue/96-calendar-sync-idempotency), not main.
Final landing must still be through merge to main.
After lower PR lands, retarget/rebase this PR and re-run validation before merge.

Scope cleanliness

Repository was already dirty with unrelated files before this checkpoint.
Intended in-scope files for this PR slice are the timeboxing Option-3 files only:
- src/fateforger/agents/timeboxing/agent.py
- src/fateforger/agents/timeboxing/nlu.py
- src/fateforger/agents/timeboxing/preferences.py
- tests/unit/test_timeboxing_constraint_selection.py
- tests/unit/test_timeboxing_stateless_agents.py
- tests/unit/test_timeboxing_constraint_extraction_background.py
- tests/unit/test_timeboxing_constraint_store_canonicalization.py

Commands/tests run

poetry run pytest -q tests/unit/test_timeboxing_constraint_selection.py tests/unit/test_timeboxing_stateless_agents.py tests/unit/test_timeboxing_constraint_extraction_background.py tests/unit/test_timeboxing_constraint_store_canonicalization.py tests/unit/test_timeboxing_durable_constraints.py
Result: 42 passed.

Acceptance criteria status (#91)

AC1: partial (core precedence mechanics implemented; still need end-to-end replay evidence)
AC2: not done
AC3: not done

Exact next step

Implement AC2 conflict-resolution summary and AC3 regression scenario, then collect Slack replay evidence and update issue/PR.

Open Items

To decide: summary format contract in stage message
To do: AC2 + AC3 + replay evidence + retarget/rebase after stack changes
Blocked by: stacked base order for final merge-to-main path

hugolytics · 2026-03-08T22:45:59Z

Kickoff Checkpoint (2026-03-08)

Current status

Resuming active work on issue Timeboxing regression: explicit in-thread constraints do not override conflicting defaults #91 using branch codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints.
Applying strict no-code-loss + stacked-PR safeguards before any rebase/retarget/cherry-pick/merge operations.

Branch

codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints

PR

Codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints #106 Codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints #106
Current base: issue/96-calendar-sync-idempotency (stacked, not final landing to main yet).

Start-of-work scope cleanliness

Worktree is already dirty at kickoff.
Baseline dirty set captured from git status --porcelain before new edits in this cycle.
I will keep Timeboxing regression: explicit in-thread constraints do not override conflicting defaults #91 behavior work scoped and avoid mixing unrelated files into any merge/closure recommendation.

Commands run

git branch --show-current
git status --porcelain
gh pr status
gh pr view 106 --json number,title,url,baseRefName,headRefName,state,isDraft,mergeStateStatus,body,commits,files,labels
gh issue view 91 --json number,title,url,state,body,labels,assignees,comments

Acceptance criteria status (from issue #91)

AC1: Partial (implementation exists; needs current-cycle revalidation evidence after any further code changes).
AC2: Not done (deterministic conflict-resolution summary still open).
AC3: Not done (explicit regression case still open).
AC4: Partial (debug snapshot fields exist; needs verification against final AC wording).
AC5: Partial (coverage exists but still requires explicit AC3 evidence in this cycle).

Exact next step

Add/confirm failing-first regression coverage for AC2/AC3, then implement scoped fix and rerun targeted suite.

Open Items

To decide: exact response-surface format for conflict-resolution summary in user-facing output.
To do: AC2 + AC3 implementation/verification; post substantial progress checkpoint with test evidence.
Blocked by: final landing path is stacked (#106 depends on base branch flow before merge-to-main readiness).

hugolytics · 2026-03-08T22:48:42Z

Substantial checkpoint

Current status

Added AC2 conflict-resolution summary behavior and AC3 regression coverage.
Targeted validation is green after test-first workflow.

Branch

codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints

Dependency / merge order

This PR is stacked on issue/96+81: calendar sync idempotency + graphiti memory backend #105 (base=issue/96-calendar-sync-idempotency), not main.
After lower PR lands, retarget/rebase this PR and rerun validation before merge.

Scope cleanliness

Repo had unrelated dirty files at checkpoint start.
This PR scope remains limited to timeboxing Option-3 files/tests.

Tests-first evidence

Added failing assertion first for conflict-resolution summary.
Verified failure, implemented fix, then reran targeted suites.

Commands/tests run

poetry run pytest -q tests/unit/test_timeboxing_stage_actions.py -k "render_constraints_preview_blocks_labels_new_active_and_selected_counts" (failed-first, then passed after fix)
poetry run pytest -q tests/unit/test_timeboxing_stage_actions.py tests/unit/test_timeboxing_constraint_selection.py tests/unit/test_timeboxing_stateless_agents.py tests/unit/test_timeboxing_constraint_extraction_background.py tests/unit/test_timeboxing_constraint_store_canonicalization.py tests/unit/test_timeboxing_durable_constraints.py
Result: 53 passed

Acceptance criteria status (#91)

AC1: done
AC2: done
AC3: done

Exact next step

Wait for issue/96+81: calendar sync idempotency + graphiti memory backend #105, retarget/rebase, rerun same suite, then post pre-close merge-readiness checkpoint.

Open Items

To decide: whether to require Slack replay evidence pre-merge
To do: retarget/rebase + rerun validation + pre-close comment
Blocked by: stack dependency (issue/96+81: calendar sync idempotency + graphiti memory backend #105)

hugolytics · 2026-03-08T22:55:33Z

Substantial Checkpoint (2026-03-08) — Graphiti-only backend + OpenRouter wiring

Current status

Implemented user-requested runtime policy changes on codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints:
- single durable memory backend (graphiti only),
- Graphiti MCP wired to OpenRouter-compatible LLM endpoint settings.
Used test-first flow for behavior changes (failing assertions captured before implementation).

Branch

codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints

PR

Codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints #106 Codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints #106
Still stacked on issue/96-calendar-sync-idempotency (not yet final landing to main).

Scope cleanliness

Worktree was already dirty at kickoff.
This checkpoint touched only the backend/config/runtime/tests/docs relevant to Graphiti-only + OpenRouter wiring.
Unrelated pre-existing dirty files remain out of scope and were not rebased/retargeted/cherry-picked/merged.

Test-first evidence (rule #8)

Updated tests first to enforce Graphiti-only backend contract and legacy-backend rejection.
Ran targeted tests before implementation; observed expected failures:
- poetry run pytest -q tests/unit/test_settings_mcp_endpoints.py tests/unit/test_task_defaults_memory.py tests/unit/test_timeboxing_memory_backend_selection.py
- Result: 7 failed / 30 passed (legacy backend acceptance still present).
Implemented changes.
Re-ran targeted suites; all green.

Commands/tests run

poetry run pytest -q tests/unit/test_settings_mcp_endpoints.py tests/unit/test_task_defaults_memory.py tests/unit/test_timeboxing_memory_backend_selection.py
- pre-fix result: 7 failed / 30 passed
poetry run pytest -q tests/unit/test_settings_mcp_endpoints.py tests/unit/test_task_defaults_memory.py tests/unit/test_timeboxing_memory_backend_selection.py tests/unit/test_runtime_mcp_startup_checks.py tests/unit/test_timeboxing_durable_constraints.py tests/unit/test_timeboxing_constraint_selection.py tests/unit/test_timeboxing_stateless_agents.py tests/unit/test_timeboxing_constraint_extraction_background.py tests/unit/test_timeboxing_constraint_store_canonicalization.py
- post-fix result: 93 passed
poetry run ruff check src/fateforger/core/config.py src/fateforger/core/runtime.py src/fateforger/agents/tasks/defaults_memory.py src/fateforger/agents/tasks/README.md src/fateforger/agents/timeboxing/agent.py tests/unit/test_settings_mcp_endpoints.py tests/unit/test_task_defaults_memory.py tests/unit/test_timeboxing_memory_backend_selection.py tests/unit/test_runtime_mcp_startup_checks.py tests/unit/test_timeboxing_durable_constraints.py
- result: passed
Runtime verification:
- docker compose up -d --force-recreate graphiti-mcp
- MCP discovery probe (mcp_server_tools) against http://localhost:8005/mcp
- result: tool_count=9

Acceptance criteria status (#91)

AC1: Partial (no regression observed in targeted Timeboxing regression: explicit in-thread constraints do not override conflicting defaults #91 suites; still needs explicit end-to-end thread evidence in this cycle).
AC2: Not done.
AC3: Not done.
AC4: Partial.
AC5: Partial.

Exact next step

Continue Timeboxing regression: explicit in-thread constraints do not override conflicting defaults #91 behavioral completion (AC2 + AC3) with focused failing-first regression, then rerun targeted suite and post evidence.

Open Items

To decide: whether to split Graphiti/OpenRouter hardening into a dedicated PR/issue after stack unblocks, or keep in Codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints #106.
To do: AC2 + AC3 implementation and evidence; maintain no-code-loss diff checks before any rebase/retarget.
Blocked by: stacked merge order for final main landing path (#106 currently depends on lower branch flow).

hugolytics · 2026-03-08T22:58:10Z

Substantial Checkpoint (2026-03-08) — Branch hygiene cleanup

Current status

Per request, cleaned up done branches only (fully merged, zero commits ahead of main).
No code edits or rebases/retargets/cherry-picks/merges performed in this step.

Branch

codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints

PR

Codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints #106 Codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints #106

Commands/tests run

git branch --merged main
git branch -r --merged origin/main
gh pr list --state all --limit 200 --json ...
git branch -d <merged-branches...>
git push origin --delete <merged-remote-branches...>
git fetch --prune origin

Deleted local branches (safe: merged, ahead_of_main=0)

codex/issue-59-taskmarshal-memory-cards
issue/40-slack-routing-constraint-refresh-guard
issue/51-weekly-review-agent-v0
issue/63-task-defaults-durability
issue/68-active-count-semantics
issue/69-memory-canonicalization
issue/71-auto-submit-idempotency
issue/72-refine-time-budget
issue/73-slack-routing-hardening
phase0-merge-temp

Deleted remote branches (safe: merged into main)

codex/issue-59-taskmarshal-memory-cards
issue/51-weekly-review-agent-v0
issue/63-task-defaults-durability
issue/72-refine-time-budget

Acceptance criteria status (#91)

Unchanged by this hygiene step (no behavioral/code changes in this checkpoint).

Exact next step

Continue Timeboxing regression: explicit in-thread constraints do not override conflicting defaults #91 completion scope and stacked-PR path validation before merge-to-main closure.

Open Items

To decide: whether to force-delete non-merged archive branches (backup/*, issue/26*, issue/28*, issue/71-one-turn-auto-submit) despite unique commits.
To do: only delete additional branches after explicit direction because they are not fully merged to main.
Blocked by: none.

hugolytics · 2026-03-08T23:34:06Z

Substantial checkpoint (halted for ambiguity/risk)

Current status

No merge/rebase/cherry-pick performed in this checkpoint.
I halted intentionally to avoid hidden diff loss under stacked-branch + dirty-worktree conditions.

Branch

codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints

PR

Codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints #106 Codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints #106
Base: issue/96-calendar-sync-idempotency (stacked)

Risk observed

Local worktree is heavily dirty with unrelated files outside Timeboxing regression: explicit in-thread constraints do not override conflicting defaults #91 scope.
Codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints #106 is stacked on issue/96+81: calendar sync idempotency + graphiti memory backend #105 and not directly on main.
issue/96+81: calendar sync idempotency + graphiti memory backend #105 itself is broad (changedFiles=64) and includes scope from multiple issues.
Given this, any retarget/rebase now risks unintended diff collapse or accidental scope mixing.

Commands run

git status --porcelain
git branch -vv --sort=-committerdate
gh pr view 105 ...
gh pr view 106 ...

Acceptance criteria status

Not changed in this checkpoint; this is a risk-control halt.

Exact next step

Await explicit maintainer decision on merge order and whether to:
1. merge issue/96+81: calendar sync idempotency + graphiti memory backend #105 first, then rebase/retarget Codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints #106; or
2. rebuild Timeboxing regression: explicit in-thread constraints do not override conflicting defaults #91 into a fresh branch from main and open a clean PR.

Open Items

To decide: merge strategy (stacked continuation vs clean rebuild)
To do: execute chosen path, then rerun agreed validation post-rebase/retarget
Blocked by: maintainer direction due high risk of code-loss/scope-mix

…ackend integration - Added `replace_session_constraints` method to `ConstraintStore` for replacing session-scope constraints. - Updated `Settings` to enforce Graphiti as the sole memory backend, removing legacy options. - Modified runtime checks to always require Graphiti availability. - Refactored tests to validate new Graphiti backend requirements and ensure proper constraint handling. - Enhanced constraint extraction logic to prioritize session constraints over profile defaults. - Added tests for session constraint replacement and validation of existing constraints in agent payloads.

…nes in defaults_memory and agent modules

hugolytics · 2026-03-10T16:04:06Z

Substantial checkpoint (strategy 1 execution)

Current status

Lower stacked PR issue/96+81: calendar sync idempotency + graphiti memory backend #105 was merged to main.
This PR (Codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints #106) was retargeted from issue/96-calendar-sync-idempotency to main.
Post-retarget diff fingerprint is unchanged (no hidden collapse detected).

Branch

codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints

PR

Codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints #106 Codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints #106

Diff safety verification

Pre-retarget gh pr diff 106 --name-only:
- src/fateforger/agents/timeboxing/graphiti_constraint_memory.py
- src/fateforger/core/README.md
- src/fateforger/core/config.py
- src/fateforger/core/runtime.py
- tests/unit/test_runtime_mcp_startup_checks.py
- tests/unit/test_settings_mcp_endpoints.py
Pre-retarget sha256 of full diff: 31ca335061ac650a8ef5da1cb99797137740c7256df58f5067d543bae7d4a1bf
Post-retarget: same file list + same sha256.

Commands/tests run (post-retarget)

poetry run pytest -q tests/unit/test_runtime_mcp_startup_checks.py tests/unit/test_settings_mcp_endpoints.py
Result: 39 passed

Acceptance criteria status

AC status for this PR is unchanged by retarget itself; this checkpoint confirms safe retarget + validation rerun.

Exact next step

Resolve PR/issue scope mismatch (this PR currently tracks graphiti/runtime files, while issue Timeboxing regression: explicit in-thread constraints do not override conflicting defaults #91 scope is session-constraint override behavior).

Open Items

To decide: keep Codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints #106 as graphiti/runtime PR (relink issue), or move Timeboxing regression: explicit in-thread constraints do not override conflicting defaults #91 changes into this PR from local branch state
To do: finalize scope mapping + run corresponding full target suite
Blocked by: maintainer decision on scope mapping

hugolytics · 2026-03-10T16:05:23Z

Substantial checkpoint (halted for scope-mix risk)

Current status

Strategy-1 step completed: issue/96+81: calendar sync idempotency + graphiti memory backend #105 merged to main; Codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints #106 retargeted to main; post-retarget tests passed.
Additional local commits on head branch are now detected and are not reflected in remote PR diff.

Branch

codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints

PR

Codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints #106 Codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints #106

Risk observed

Local branch is ahead 3 vs origin/codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints.
Ahead commits include mixed scope (timeboxing + tasks + env/docs/worktree artifacts).
Pushing as-is would expand Codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints #106 far beyond intended scope and risks hidden scope bleed.

Evidence commands

git log --oneline origin/codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints..HEAD
git diff --name-only origin/codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints...HEAD
gh pr diff 106 --name-only

Acceptance criteria status

No AC movement in this checkpoint; this is a safety halt.

Exact next step

Decide safe extraction strategy before push:
1. create a clean branch from main and apply only in-scope Timeboxing regression: explicit in-thread constraints do not override conflicting defaults #91 files; open clean PR, or
2. split local ahead commits and push only selected commit(s)/file set to Codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints #106.

Open Items

To decide: clean PR rebuild vs selective split into Codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints #106
To do: apply chosen strategy, rerun tests, update issue/PR checkpoints
Blocked by: maintainer direction on scope extraction strategy

hugolytics · 2026-03-10T16:26:16Z

Branch audit against main shows this branch is broader than issue #91.

Implemented on branch (committed, not in main):

Graphiti memory backend wiring for timeboxing/task defaults
constraint reconciliation utilities and tests
local/shared constraint canonicalization follow-up work
runtime/config/readme updates for Graphiti path
sync-core scaffolding
substantial docs/blog/review-system additions

Branch state:

branch: codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints
PR: Codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints #106 (draft)
ahead of main: 7 commits
local worktree is dirty with an extra uncommitted diff in src/fateforger/agents/timeboxing/preferences.py

Assessment:

This is not a clean issue-Timeboxing regression: explicit in-thread constraints do not override conflicting defaults #91 branch anymore.
Merging it as-is would mix the session-constraint override regression with broader memory/backend/docs work.
The right next step is to park this branch/PR as scope-drifted, preserve it, and start the Neo4j/Graphiti cutover from a fresh main-based issue branch.

Open Items

To decide: none
To do: supersede Replace Mem0 with temporal memory backend (Graphiti path) + reconciliation policy #81 into Canonical Graphiti memory cutover: Neo4j backend, no Mem0, no file artifacts #90; start fresh branch from main for the canonical memory cutover ticket
Blocked by: none

hugolytics · 2026-03-10T16:30:52Z

Preservation note: the previously stashed local diff has been committed on this branch as dc807c4 (chore(issue-91): preserve stashed formatting-only preferences diff). This ensures no local-only stash state remains attached to the parked branch.

hugolytics mentioned this pull request Mar 8, 2026

issue/96+81: calendar sync idempotency + graphiti memory backend #105

Merged

hugolytics mentioned this pull request Mar 8, 2026

Timeboxing regression: explicit in-thread constraints do not override conflicting defaults #91

Open

hugolytics mentioned this pull request Mar 8, 2026

Timeboxing Refine: dual constraint extraction per turn (graphflow_turn + refine_background_memory both extracting) #104

Open

3 tasks

hugocool added 2 commits March 10, 2026 16:51

chore: add .worktrees/ to .gitignore

63d267e

hugolytics changed the base branch from issue/96-calendar-sync-idempotency to main March 10, 2026 16:02

refactor: Improve code readability by formatting and restructuring li…

8289cba

…nes in defaults_memory and agent modules

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints#106

Codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints#106
hugocool wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
codex/issue-91-option3-session-constraints

hugocool commented Mar 8, 2026

Uh oh!

hugolytics commented Mar 8, 2026

Uh oh!

hugolytics commented Mar 8, 2026

Uh oh!

hugolytics commented Mar 8, 2026

Uh oh!

hugolytics commented Mar 8, 2026

Uh oh!

hugolytics commented Mar 8, 2026

Uh oh!

hugolytics commented Mar 8, 2026

Uh oh!

hugolytics commented Mar 8, 2026

Uh oh!

hugolytics commented Mar 10, 2026

Uh oh!

hugolytics commented Mar 10, 2026

Uh oh!

hugolytics commented Mar 10, 2026

Uh oh!

hugolytics commented Mar 10, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Conversation

hugocool commented Mar 8, 2026

Linked issue

Acceptance criteria

Notebook -> artifact mapping (required for notebook-driven work)

Verification performed

System-of-record sync

Uh oh!

hugolytics commented Mar 8, 2026

Merge Handoff

Uh oh!

hugolytics commented Mar 8, 2026

Uh oh!

hugolytics commented Mar 8, 2026

Kickoff Checkpoint (2026-03-08)

Uh oh!

hugolytics commented Mar 8, 2026

Uh oh!

hugolytics commented Mar 8, 2026

Substantial Checkpoint (2026-03-08) — Graphiti-only backend + OpenRouter wiring

Uh oh!

hugolytics commented Mar 8, 2026

Substantial Checkpoint (2026-03-08) — Branch hygiene cleanup

Uh oh!

hugolytics commented Mar 8, 2026

Uh oh!

hugolytics commented Mar 10, 2026

Uh oh!

hugolytics commented Mar 10, 2026

Uh oh!

hugolytics commented Mar 10, 2026

Uh oh!

hugolytics commented Mar 10, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants